My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 09 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 09 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:26 AM
Creation date
9/8/2014 10:34:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2014 09 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />August 11, 2014 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />having the Assessor paying attention to book valuation. Rick Brew would like <br />to check with experienced bond counsel regarding capitalization. Chair <br />Becker said to keep in mind the risk premium is 7 %. <br />There was a question of when property tax revenues received. Attorney Light <br />said the payment date under the bond documents is once a year and he will <br />check with Finance Director Kevin Watson to see if the LRC collects once per <br />year or other schedule. <br />Commissioner Menaker is troubled by compounding. He thinks 7% tax <br />exempt is a good return. <br />Attorney Light reiterated that the term sheet says 7 %, simple interest. Chair <br />Becker asked the LRC if anyone had any objection to simple interest. There <br />were no objections. <br />4. US Bank is the paying agent. <br />5. There will be checks and balances: Public Works Director, Economic <br />Development Director, City Manager, Finance Director will review pay <br />requests. The developer will certify the requests represent actually incurred, <br />qualifying costs and costs must be certified by the project engineer. This will <br />be spelled out in the closing documents. <br />The bond documents will go to City Council on September 2, 2014 and per <br />the City -LRC cooperation agreement it will need to determine by resolution <br />"that the City's interests in connection with such bonds are adequately <br />protected." LRC will review and see that the bond documents are prepared in <br />accordance with the Term Sheet and approve in September. <br />b. Discussion on funding the remaining costs for Regional Detention: <br />On July 1, 2014, the LRC said they are willing to fund part of the Regional <br />Detention. The 2014 LRC budget has an existing fund balance of approximately <br />$150,000 uncommitted. <br />DeJong believes the LRC will have enough funds for the remaining cost of the <br />detention pond in 2015. The additional funds may go into the construction fund. <br />Projected date for completion is when Phase 2 is completed. The funds wouldn't <br />be put in until they are needed. <br />DeJong asked if the LRC is willing to commit fund for regional detention. Chair <br />Becker asked what would happen if LRC did not commit $325,000. DeJong <br />responded the regional detention pond is not a requirement for development, but <br />an improvement to achieve the desired development within the Core Area. If <br />regional detention is not constructed, the property owners within the Core Area <br />would be required to provide their required detention on their properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.