Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APPROVED – AUGUST 10, 2004 <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />6.The following items are tentatively scheduled Tuesday, August 10, 2004. <br /> <br /> Coffee Shop, <br />a special review use for an approximately 1,000 SF Coffee Shop to be located <br />in the southwest corner of the existing one story building at 168 CTC Boulevard. The shop <br />would include both inside and outside seating and to go service. Lot 5, Block 4, Business <br />Center at CTC Replat D. Case #04-017-UR. <br /> <br />Case Manager: Kenneth Johnstone, Principal Planner <br /> <br /> <br />Applicant and Owner: CTC Industrial, LLC (Steve Meyers) <br /> <br /> <br />Representative: JM Associates, Inc. (Jerry Moore) <br /> <br />Lipton asked Johnstone for an update regarding the case scheduled for August 10, 2004. <br /> <br />Johnstone reported that the case is on schedule for the August meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />7.Staff Comments <br /> <br /> <br />Lipton asked for other staff comments. Johnstone stated that a copy of the letter from Randy <br />Luallin, property owner at 301 East St., had been provided for their reference. It had been <br />brought to the attention of Staff by Commissioner Loo that she had not seen the letter that Mr. <br />Luallin had reference in a Letter to the Editor. <br /> <br />Johnstone discussed the possibility of providing a Comprehensive Plan Update to the Planning <br />Commission at the August 10 meeting. The Commissioners requested that an email be sent to <br />advise them of the date for the update presentation. <br /> <br /> <br />8.Planning Commission Comments <br /> <br />Lipton asked for Commissioners comments. <br /> <br />Kalish asked if the City and the consultants for the Comprehensive Plan had a method in place <br />for property owners to propose a specific land use designation for their property. Johnstone <br />stated that he was not aware of such but would discuss with the consultants. <br /> <br />Lipton requested a discussion of the Lutheran Church on Via Appia and its apparent non- <br />compliance with its approved PUD. He requested support from the other Commissioners to <br />request they come before the Commission to review the approved PUD and for their explanation <br />of why they have not complied with its approval. All the Commissioners agreed that something <br />needed to be done but asked Johnstone what other options are available. After further discussion <br />between Johnstone and the Commissioners it was recommended that staff write a letter to the <br />church, with a CC to the Commissioners, to address the non-compliance with their PUD. Then <br />based on the churches response the Commissioners will decide how to precede. <br /> <br /> <br />9.Adjournment <br />Lipton called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Pritchard and seconded by <br /> <br />Kalish. Meeting adjourned at 7:00 pm. <br />5 <br /> <br />