My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2004 12 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2004 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2004 12 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:15 AM
Creation date
9/10/2014 12:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2004 12 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPROVED – JANUARY 13, 2005 <br /> <br />Lipton summarized the request and asked if one of the main concerns was the lot width to lot <br />depth ratio. <br />Wood confirmed that his summary was accurate and the lot width to lot depth ratio concern. <br /> <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />David Waldman, 255 Continental View Dr. reviewed the purpose of the request with the <br />following points: <br />Subdivision replat as it relates to the approved annexation agreement. <br /> <br /> <br />The final PUD. <br /> <br /> <br />The ROW vacation. <br /> <br /> <br />The conservation easement. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Deborski asked for a clarification for the location of the Davidson Ditch. <br />Waldman confirmed that it is not located on either of the two lots but in what is known as the <br />Pony Pasture. <br /> <br />Deborski asked if Replat Lot 1 and Replat Lot 2 would have a shared driveway. <br />Waldman stated they would not. <br /> <br />Pritchard had no questions. <br /> <br />Loo asked for clarification of the Conservation Easement, the current use of that property, and <br />the reason for the easement. <br />Waldman stated that the area is currently used for the grazing of ponies and the reason for the <br />easement is to keep the rural feel of the area. <br /> <br />Loo asked for a clarification of the ROW vacation. <br />Waldman used a map to explain the vacation. <br /> <br />Kalish asked for copies of the Annexation Petition. <br />Wood explained that the petition is not usually included in the packet. <br /> <br />Members of the Public: None. <br /> <br />Staff and Applicant Summary and Recommendation: No additional comments. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed Commission Comments: <br />Lipton supports the request. <br /> <br />Kalish stated that she does not like the process that has been used for the requests. She also <br />prefers the original replat design of the Lot 1 instead of how it was presented this evening. <br /> <br />Pritchard, Loo, Deborski, McDermott and McAvinew had no comments. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.