My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2005 11 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2005 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2005 11 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:16 AM
Creation date
9/10/2014 3:21:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2005 11 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />NOVEMBER 10, 2005 <br />Page 11 of 12 <br /> <br />Loo stated that she supports the amendment to the GDP and that she appreciates the fact <br />that the Planning Commission will get to look at a proposal for a fueling station. <br />Deborski stated he supports the additional retail for the site, however, he has concerns <br />regarding the site as location for a fueling station. The property handling of the egress <br />and ingress need to addressed during the PUD review process. He stated he would not <br />support the request if it included a permitted use of a fueling station. <br />Sheets agreed that the site would need considerable landscape work. Also, if a proposed <br />project for a fueling station comes before the Planning Commission, we will need to look <br />not only at the egress and ingress but also the landscaping. <br />Pritchard discussed in more detail the option of voting on the recommendation by Staff <br />and then allowing the City Council to make the final decision. <br />Loo moved and McAvinew seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 25, Series <br />2005, Centennial Valley Business Park, a request to amend the General Development <br />Plan of the Centennial Valley Business Park to allow retail uses in what is currently an <br />office planning area at 410 Centennial Parkway, Lot 1, Block 1, Centennial Valley <br />Business Park. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton Excused <br />Tom McAvinew Yes <br />Chris Pritchard No <br />Susan Loo Yes <br />Michael Deborski No <br />Monica Sheets No <br />Hank Dalton Excused <br />Motion failed: 2 to 3 (Lipton and Dalton excused) <br /> <br />The following items <br />are tentatively scheduled for December 8, 2005 at 6:30 PM <br /> <br />Allen Company, represented by RVP Architecture, <br /> a request for a final <br />PUD development plan to build three buildings totally approximately 320,000 <br />SF on three lots and construct the associated public street and utility <br />infrastructure. Lot 3 is planned to be developed first with a 222,000 SF <br />building to be used for manufacturing, assembly and warehousing of outdoor <br />sporting goods equipment (Allen Co.). The other two lots will be developed as <br />needed for expansion or for separate uses. Case #05-027-FP (Withdrawn) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Applicant and Owner: Allen Company <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Representative: RVP Architecture, Robert Van Pelt <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Case Manager: Kenneth Johnstone, Principal Planner <br /> <br />CTC Filing No. 2, Replat ‘A’, <br /> a minor subdivision replat for CTC Filing No. <br />2 to eliminate 3 lots, reconfigure the remaining lots and realign CTC <br />Boulevard between Boxelder Street and Dillon Road. Case #05-029-FS <br />(Withdrawn) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.