Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 14, 2014 <br />Page 21 of 23 <br />Council member Lipton stated his understanding in the general fund there is an overall <br />deficit of $88,000, which includes revenues from the General Fund, CIP and operating <br />expenses. Finance Director Watson explained the expenditures exceed the revenues <br />by $570,000, but with the turn -back, staff is projecting the ending fund balance would be <br />at 15.5% of annual expenditures. The City's limit is 15 %. <br />Council member Lipton wanted to see increases in the fund balance for the general <br />fund in 2015. He requested the City Manager come back with a budget, showing a <br />surplus of $250,000, as a down payment of building up the fund balance surpluses. He <br />expressed his concern over the uncertainty of a number of projects and initiatives and <br />stated if the fund balance is positive there would be room to deal with issues in 2015. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated the budget is set on a very responsible course based on <br />events of last year's flood. He felt the fund balance will grow. He was not in favor of a <br />new budget with a $250,000 surplus. He did not support Council member Lipton's <br />suggestion. Mayor Muckle agreed with Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. <br />Council member Stolzmann agreed with Council member Lipton and felt there were <br />projects, which could be delayed a year, which would help bring up the reserves. She <br />felt there were worthy projects, which were not funded. Council member Loo also <br />agreed with targeting $250,000 to increase the reserves. <br />Council member Keany stated there is a fiscal policy set by previous Councils. He felt if <br />Council wants to discuss altering the fiscal policy, it should be done at a future meeting, <br />but he did not support making changes on the fly. <br />Council member Lipton was concerned with the minimum amount in the General Fund <br />for the next two to three years. He stated it was predicated on a lot of assumptions on <br />the revenue and expense side. He felt it was an issue of setting priorities and not a <br />matter that just because the City has the money the money has to be spent. He stated <br />he would rather limit the amount of money given in the beginning and felt it was prudent. <br />City Manager Fleming voiced his appreciation of the perspectives voiced by the City <br />Council. He referred to the list of assumptions for each of the revenue sources, which <br />was the driving source for the budget and asked Council to direct staff if those <br />assumptions are reasonable. <br />Council member Moss supported a $250,000 overall reduction in the budget. Mayor <br />Muckle stated the Council would then be changing their fiscal policy. Council member <br />Stolzmann felt it was being cautionary and helping build up the reserves. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton noted Finance Director Watson's projections are very <br />conservative. He did not support changing the policy. Council member Lipton stated his <br />understanding of the fiscal policy is a minimum fund balance of 15 %, however it does <br />