Laserfiche WebLink
G. If there exists any other prerequisite under the Colorado Governmental <br />Immunity Act to the City's obligations to defend and indemnify the employee, the employee has <br />satisfied that prerequisite. <br />Sec. 2.06.030. Legal representation of employees. <br />The City's obligation in section 2.06.020 to pay an employee's attorney's fees shall apply <br />only to legal counsel chosen and retained by the City to represent the employee in the civil <br />action. When the City and the employee are named defendants in the same civil action, the City <br />may retain the same legal counsel to represent them both. If, however, in the judgment of the <br />City Attorney, a conflict of interest is determined to exist between the employee and the City, the <br />City shall retain separate legal counsel for the employee and shall be obligated under section <br />2.06.020 to pay the fees for such legal counsel. In either case, if a court subsequently determines <br />that the employee's act or omission did not occur during the employee's performance of his or <br />her duties for the City and within the scope of the employee's employment with the City, or that <br />the act or omission of the employee was willful and wanton, the City may request, and the court <br />is required to order, such employee to reimburse the City for its reasonable costs and attorney's <br />fees incurred in the defense of the employee in the civil action. <br />Sec. 2.06.040. Reimbursement of employees' attorney's fees in criminal matters. <br />A. The City shall pay the reasonable attorney's fees, as determined by the City <br />Manager (or by the City's special legal counsel if it is the City Manager's attorney's fees being <br />paid), incurred by an employee related to any criminal investigation or criminal charge if all of <br />the following circumstances exist: <br />1. The investigation is conducted or the charge is formally filed by an <br />agency of the federal government or of a state or local government, or by a person filing a <br />complaint under the Code of Ethics enforcement provisions set forth in Section 5 -12 of the City <br />Charter; <br />2. The investigation or charge arises from an alleged act or omission of <br />the employee occurring during the performance of his or her duties and within the scope of his or <br />her employment with the City; <br />3. The investigation results in no charge being filed or any prosecution <br />results in the dismissal or acquittal of all charges filed or, in the case of a complaint under the <br />Code of Ethics, results in the dismissal without prosecution, dismissal upon successful <br />completion of a deferred prosecution, or the dismissal or acquittal by the court of all charges; and <br />4. The City Manager determines that the employee's conduct from which <br />the investigation or charge arises was not willful and wanton, as described in section 2.06.020.B; <br />provided, however, if it is the City Manager's attorney's fees that are being considered for <br />payment, special legal counsel for the City shall make the determination of whether the City <br />Manager's conduct from which the investigation or charge arises was willful and wanton, as <br />described in section 2.06.020.B. <br />Ordinance No. 1676, Series 2014 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />