Laserfiche WebLink
#¨³¸®¥,®´¨²µ¨««¤#¨³¨¹¤­3´±µ¤¸ <br />- ¸wuvw <br />Generallywithratingssohighthereisnotalotofroomforgrowth,butLouisvilleimproved <br />from2008to2012intwocategories:Louisvilleasaplacetoretireandasaplacetowork. <br />Table2:AspectsofQualityofLifeComparedbyYear <br />Pleasecirclethenumberthatcomesclosesttoyouropinionabout <br />thequalityoflifeinLouisville:(Percentratingas"excellent"or <br />´mšš7u|œ«201220082004199919941990 <br />HowdoyourateLouisvilleasaplacetolive?98%98%96%NANANA <br />HowdoyourateLouisvilleasaplacetoraisechildren?98%97%96%NA83%98% <br />HowdoyouratetheoverallqualityoflifeinLouisville?97%97%94%NA92%97% <br />Howdoyourateyourneighborhoodasaplacetolive?95%92%89%NANANA <br />HowdoyourateLouisvilleasaplacetoretire?86%79%69%NANANA <br />HowdoyourateLouisvilleasaplacetowork?74%66%NANANANA <br />*Thesequestionswerenotaskedin1999. <br />AppendixB:ComparisonofResponsesbyRespondentDemographics showscomparisonsof <br />responsestothesequalityoflifequestionsbyavarietyofdemographiccategories:age, <br />gender,voterregistrationstatus,lengthofresidencyandtheWardofresidence.While <br />ratingsweregenerallyhighacrossallgroups,olderresidents(55+)weremorelikelytogive <br />favorableratingstotheirneighborhoodasaplacetolivethanweretheiryounger <br />counterparts.Residentswhowereregisteredtovoteweremorelikelytoratehighly <br />Louisvilleasaplacetolive,theirneighborhoodasaplacetoliveandLouisvilleasaplaceto <br />workas¤·¢¤««¤­³or¦®®£thanwerethosenotregisteredtovote.ResidentsinWard1 <br />tendedtogivelowerratingstothevariousaspectsofqualityoflifethanthoseinWards2 <br />and3.See AppendixB:ComparisonofResponsesbyRespondentDemographics formore <br />details. <br />vw <br />