My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2014 12 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2000-2019 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2014 12 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:21:24 AM
Creation date
12/15/2014 11:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
OSABPKT 2014 12 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />November 12th, 2014 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />Scott Belonger asked whether the specific trail alignment was set in stone and <br />how it would fit in with the Hwy 42 Master Plan and the South Street underpass. <br />Cameron showed on a map that there is currently planned a lighted intersection across <br />Hwy 42, that would feed into both the South Street underpass and the Harney Lastoka <br />trail network. <br />Urban Drainage will be contributing about $2 million, Lafayette will be <br />contributing approximately $1 million, and the rest will come from the Stormwater Fund <br />of the City of Louisville. <br />Helen asked whether the board would be asked to review the trails again before <br />they are built. Cameron said that they would be working closely with Open Space Staff, <br />and they could come back to the board. <br />Joe asked if there was a final easement/acquisition compensation with Urban <br />Drainage for the value of the affected land. Cameron replied that these are under <br />negotiations. Joe and Helen suggested that the compensation money could go back into <br />the Conservation Trust -Land Acquisition Fund, or used on the trails of the property. <br />Mike asked whether this project is truly necessary, as the 2013 flood did not seem <br />to impact Harney Lastoka too badly. Cameron responded by saying that while Coal <br />Creek itself experienced a 400 year flood, the City itself seemed to only experience a 50 <br />year flood, so while the creek flooded dramatically, the City runoff in 2013 <br />underestimates an 100 year incident. <br />The board appreciated the plan to omit the 7.1 drainageway. <br />A team of staff representatives from the landowners of Harney Lastoka <br />(Lousiville, Lafayette, and Boulder County) made comments on this project, which were <br />included in the meeting packet. Ember went through the team's comments on the <br />projects. <br />Tom mentioned that the comment about revegetation, should indicate native <br />species. <br />The board commended the three Open Space team on its comments. Ember asked <br />for a formal vote of approval of the Open Space team's comments. Mike moved to vote <br />to endorse the comments with the change mentioned. Missy seconded. The motion <br />passed unanimously <br />VIII. Discussion Item: Wayfinding -Trail Naming Concepts and Trail Modifications <br />Presented by: Kristin Cypher and Team, C +B Design <br />Kristin reviewed that the goals of the project are signs, trails, education, and <br />mapping. Her goal for the board that night was to decide about trails (hierarchies, <br />naming, and connections) so the consultants can move along to the next phases of signs <br />and design. Kristin also quickly reviewed the board's sign preferences from last time. <br />Patsy spoke next. She pointed out that most of what is needed in the City trail <br />network is already there. She presented guidelines for identifying primary routes of the <br />network: <br />-use existing facilities <br />- connect to other primary routes <br />-be as long as possible (connect to other municipalities) <br />- consider major nodes and destinations <br />- utilize trails standards <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.