Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 12 15

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes November 17, 2014 Page 7 of 10 Fahey stated she believed other buildings on the site, such as a stacked stone building, can have architectural significance. Haley stated she believed the property has architectural integrity but was concerned if the property was actually located within the City of Louisville, based on the applicant's presentation. She also believes since the longtime ownership of the Hoyle family, who has multi - generations of farming from Oklahoma, is willing to release this property then that action should be taken into consideration. Watson asked if there were any specific ages to the structure. Trice stated it appears the buildings have been constructed over time, with the stone structure appearing to be the oldest, but the house is stated to be built in 1913. Watson stated he didn't think the building appeared to be built in 1913. Watson asked the applicant if there was any way any of these structures could be reused in the PUD. Lopez stated he was not prepared to answer that but he does know the parties interested in the property are interested in developing the property industrial. Stewart asked what the size of the property was. Trice stated it was 33 acres. Stewart stated it appears the existing buildings take over approximately 1112th or 1115th of the property, basically one pad site of the existing CTC lot sizes. He stated he thought it appears the buildings could be saved and the property could still be built out. He believes demolition should not happen until a PUD is submitted so we have more information to go off of for reuse. Stewart asked if there was a land dedication involved at time of development. Trice stated she was unsure. Stewart stated he believes there are ways to work around these structures. He added he would vote to place the 180 day stay on this property. Fahey made a motion to place a 180 day stay with a condition the applicant shall perform a historical assessment. Stewart asked if she meant the photo assessment. Fahey stated that is what she meant. But she wants the 180 day stay. Haley seconded the motion.