My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 01 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 01 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:09 AM
Creation date
1/9/2015 11:25:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2015 01 08
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. The applicant shall comply with the comments stated <br />Public Works prior to recordation. <br />2. Request that a landscaping buffer be included on the <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 11, 2014 <br />Page 11 of 17 <br />in the December 3, 2014 memo from <br />northern part of this property that <br />buffers the expansion project from the property to the north. <br />Motion second by Russell. Roll call vote. <br />Name <br />Vote <br />Chris Pritchard <br />Yes <br />Jeff Moline <br />Yes <br />Steve Brauneis <br />Yes <br />Cary Tengler <br />Yes <br />Tom Rice <br />Yes <br />Scott Russell <br />Yes <br />Ann O'Connell <br />Yes <br />Motion passed /failed: <br />Pass <br />Motion passes 7 -0. <br />Recess at 7:30 pm. Resume at 7:40 pm. <br />Small Area Plan — South Bowl <br />and measures of success. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Scott Robinson presented fro ower Poi <br />• Phase I- Desire - Stre ` eaknes •rtuni <br />measures of success. <br />• Community Input <br />Stakeholder interviews <br />• Mostly focused on individua <br />• Revitalize commercial areas <br />• Improve transportation connections <br />• Make corridor more inviting for visitors <br />• Mixed feelings about more residential <br />www.EnvisionLouisvilleCO.com <br />• Better bike and pedestrian connections <br />• Automobile traffic is worse <br />• Varying opinions on development <br />• Lacking small town character and sense of community <br />Public kick -off meeting <br />• Dot exercise showing Likes, Dislikes, Immediate Change <br />• Small group discussions <br />• Community oriented businesses <br />• Should be more of a destination <br />• Better bike and pedestrian connections <br />• Not well integrated with Louisville <br />• Acts as a barrier between neighborhoods <br />• Traffic and railroad impacts <br />• Better sense of community and small town feel <br />and endorsement of SWOT analysis <br />nd Threats (SWOT). Project <br />perties or areas of interest <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.