My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 01 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 01 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:18 PM
Creation date
1/13/2015 2:44:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2015 01 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 15, 2014 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Motion approved by voice vote. <br />Public Comments on Items Not on the Agenda — <br />Jean Morgan stated there is an old building at the old shops property that needs to be <br />saved. The metal building is located near the back of the property. She believes it <br />would make a nice building for storage. <br />Fahey asked if the building has been designated historic. <br />Trice stated the city has not designated this structure. <br />Morgan stated the building could also be given away. <br />Morgan also asked why a discussion of the public hearing signs were not placed on the <br />agenda. <br />Trice stated staff is placing this item in the discussions for the Preservation Master Plan. <br />Watson asked if Morgan has brought this up with the Planning Commission. <br />Morgan stated she has not. She stated the demo application was what brought it to her <br />attention. <br />Stewart stated he wouldn't mind talking about it before the Preservation Master Plan. <br />Fahey stated she agreed. She also stated she would like to discuss the demolition <br />application process that came up during the Empire Sign process. <br />Watson asked staff to bring a sign mock up to the next meeting. <br />Morgan asked if she should also go to the City Council to discuss the public hearing <br />signs. <br />Watson stated she could speak to all the boards she would like to. <br />PROBABLE CAUSE — 1006 Pine <br />Trice presented the information in staffs report. She presented the social history of the <br />structure. She then stated the purpose of the application is to request a building <br />assessment. She stated the structure is on the National Register and should be <br />considered for eligibility for local landmarking based on its architectural integrity. <br />Fahey asked if we approve $6,000 do they get all the amount or is it up to $6,000. <br />Trice stated it was up to $6,000. <br />Echohawk believes the National Register listing speaks for itself and the structure has a <br />very high level of architectural and social integrity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.