Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 6 2015 <br />Page 6 of 15 <br />Recommended Rate Increases: <br />Service 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 <br />Water $12.32 $12.32 $13.68 $15.18 $15.18 $15.18 <br />Wastewater 20.69 26.28 31.53 32.79 32.79 32.79 <br />Stormwater 4.23 4.23 4.74 4.78 4.78 4.78 <br />Combined $37.24 $42.83 $49.94 $52.76 $52.78 $52.86 <br />Bill <br />% of Increase -0- 15.0% 16.6% 5.6% 0.0% 0.2% <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann voiced her appreciation for all the work done on the Utility <br />Funds Financial Plan and acknowledged the need to increase the rates. She did not <br />agree with the fundamental assumption behind the cost of service adjustments for <br />residential and non - residential use. She did not feel it addressed the underlining costs <br />being driven by those two groups because the billing is set up to encourage more <br />conservation on the residential side. She stated it is not consistent with the American <br />Water Works Association manual. She did not favor water budgets or continuing to <br />work on the concept. She addressed the stormwater proposal, which only takes 50 <br />properties out of the floodplain at a cost of $8.8 Million. She did not see a benefit of the <br />project and favored delaying or discontinuing the project. She agreed the rate <br />increases were necessary so the City is not growth dependent, but supported taking out <br />any projects not necessary, to keep the water rates as low as possible. <br />Public Works Director Kowar stated the City is not required to do financial service <br />adjustments or the stormwater project, but is required to do the wastewater project to <br />meet future EPA permits. <br />Council member Lipton stressed the importance of explaining to the public the reason <br />for the increases. He agreed they are long term investments the public should be <br />required to pay for, but he would be more comfortable with smoothing out the increases <br />over a period of time instead of frontloading them. He addressed the water budget <br />concept and stated his understanding the City Council had directed staff not to work on <br />this project. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton also agreed the City Council directed staff not to proceed with <br />the water budget concept. <br />Council member Leh agreed with the concept of smoothing out the rate increases over <br />a period of time. He inquired what measures will be taken to assist residents who have <br />financial difficulties in paying for the increases in the utility bills. Public Works Director <br />Kowar stated there is currently not a financial assistance program for utilities, but it <br />could be investigated and noted other cities have such programs. Council member Loo <br />stated the Senior Foundation have funds to assist seniors with their utility bills. <br />