Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />City at <br />- <br />Louisville <br />COLORADO • SINCE 1878 <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />AGENDA ITEM IV <br />SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />CITY SERVICES FACILITY PROJECT UPDATE <br />JANUARY 23, 2015 <br />PRESENTED BY: MALCOLM FLEMING, CITY MANAGER <br />KURT KOWAR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR <br />KEVIN WATSON, FINANCE DIRECTOR <br />HEATHER BALSER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER <br />SUMMARY: <br />Construction work on the City Services Facility (CSF) site at Dillon Road and S. 104th St <br />is proceeding favorably and prospects look good for substantial completion and move -in <br />by August of this year. When 2014 expenses are accounted for, a total of $10,544,585 <br />is available for this project in the City's 2014 and 2015 budgets. The estimated cost to <br />finish the project is $10,849,256, including a contingency of $150,000. Consequently, <br />based on all available information, staff estimates that the project is currently $304,670 <br />over the currently approved budget. Accordingly, to complete the project without making <br />changes in scope would require a budget amendment of this amount and allocation of <br />$76,168 each from the Capital Projects, Open Space and Parks, Water and Wastewater <br />Utility Funds. The basis for these calculations are presented in detail in the attached <br />table titled "City Services Facility Expenditures, Budget and Overall Accounting ". <br />Staff, the design and construction teams continue working hard to identify cost savings <br />and to date have implemented, without compromising the functionality and long -term cost <br />effectiveness of the facility, significant "Value Engineering" in design, materials, <br />equipment and other changes. Although staff will continue to look for ways to save, at this <br />point in the project, staff does not think it is likely to identify other significant savings. <br />Staff presented to Council in September 2014 a Guaranteed Maximum Price contract <br />with Bryan Construction Inc. that appeared to lock in a guaranteed price above which <br />the project would not go. However, the GMP figure presented during the September 2 <br />Council meeting was based on the Design Development documents (60% design), <br />which means there were many details in the scope remaining to be worked out. As the <br />project has progressed, the design work to bring the documents to the 100% level has <br />resulted in scope changes that have produced additional costs /change orders. <br />Staff believes that the design and construction team is working well, the construction is <br />proceeding successfully and that it was poor communication, not other issues, that <br />failed to highlight in September the remaining uncertainty and unavoidable risks of cost <br />increases. We have made staffing and procedural changes to prevent such <br />communication lapses from happening in the future. This study session is intended to <br />project detailed project information, introduce Council to the contractor and design team <br />and address any questions Council members may have. <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />2 <br />