My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 02 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 02 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:18 PM
Creation date
2/13/2015 3:20:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2015 02 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 12, 2015 <br />Page 2 of 11 <br /> <br />She was concerned a discussion item has not been placed on this past couple HPC <br />agendas. She stated she thought the regular posting signs for regular properties is fine, <br />but Downtown posting should be handled different due to the parked cars and Main <br />Street Patios. <br />Watson asked staff about any potential solutions. <br />Trice stated the main issue is Downtown and this item will be on the next agenda. <br />Watson stated initially it was to be discussed during the Preservation Master Plan, but <br />we have decided to put it on the next agenda. <br />Morgan stated she would like to see a policy created on this. <br />Fahey stated item 17 on our agenda speaks of posting locations. <br />Trice stated that is for posting the public meeting agenda. <br />Stewart stated it was a mistake to not include it on the agenda and hopes we can see it <br />on the next meeting agenda. <br />John Leary spoke regarding landmarking signs. He believes there should be additional <br />landmarking signs that give a brief history of the house. He stated if others get another <br />plaque make sure to ask for the discount. <br />Welcome New Commission Members <br />Stewart and Koertje are new, and old, commission members. <br />Public Hearing – Landmark Request – 1101 Grant <br />Trice presented the information in staff’s report. She presented the social history of the <br />structure. She then stated the purpose of the application is to request a landmark for <br />the structure. She stated the structure should be considered for eligibility for local <br />landmarking based on its architectural integrity. She recommends the house be named <br />for the Atkins Family, who owned the house for over 60 years. <br />Watson asked if the applicant <br />Koertje asked if the landmarking was just for the house. <br />Trice said it was for the whole house. <br />Stewart asked if the shed was a contributing structure. <br />Trice stated it does appear to have significance but it is unclear of the exact age. It <br />does appear to be over 50 years. <br />Kathy Valentine, applicant, stated they want to landmark because the house has been <br />around for over 100 years and the mining history of the previous owners. She is
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.