Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 02 09

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2015 Page 6 of 11 Stewart stated the best approach would be to lift the structure and place steel underneath, but the cost for that is unknown. Koertje made a motion to place a stay on the demolition of this structure due to its eligibility. He stated the loss would be detrimental to the neighborhood. He stated there is evidence of neglect and potential high costs of repair, but not enough detailed evidence. He placed a stay of up to 90 days and recommended we review this at our next meeting to explore options. Fahey seconded the motion and added she would like to see details in the cost to repair the structure and the cost to demo and rebuild. Watson stated he did not believe that would be an “apples to apples” comparison and might not be fair. Fahey stated it will cost a certain amount of money to repair the existing foundation and add a new. Stewart stated that would be phase two of the process, after design assistance has been provided. Motion was approved 7 to 0. Meyers asked for a summary of the decision. Trice stated there has been a 90 day stay placed on the decision and more information needs to be provided for design options. Stewart stated it is 90 days from the application date. Trice agreed and stated the application was submitted in November. PUBLIC HEARING – Alteration Certificate/Grant Application – 733 Pine Watson asked if this item has been continued. Trice stated it has been continued due to lack of information. Update of the Preservation Master Plan Trice introduced the consultant, Mary Terese, who will give an update of the process. Mary Terese presented a recap of the public meeting. Watson asked if this was going to be online for others to review. Trice stated it will be on the Preservation Master Plan of the website.