My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 02 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 02 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
2/18/2015 8:41:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 02 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 3, 2015 <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />business. The purpose of the Plan is to guide Louisville's city -wide preservation <br />program through the next 20 years. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO proposed the following <br />edit to the purpose: The purpose of the Plan is to guide Louisville's "voluntary" city -wide <br />preservation program through the next 20 years." He felt the word "voluntary" should be <br />incorporated into the purpose statement to ensure historic preservation efforts remain <br />voluntary and respectful of individual property rights. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Loo addressed the first sentence of the Vision Statement, which states <br />"will retain ". She preferred the words "should be encouraged ". She felt the word "will" <br />implies a mandatory purpose. She preferred a phrase which provides more latitude. <br />Mayor Muckle stated a vision statement does not require a Council action. The vision is <br />to preserve the City's historic past. He felt the word "encouraging" is lecturing. <br />Council member Loo stated in her experience on Planning Commission there was an <br />ongoing debate on the word "should" and "will ". If it appeared in a vision statement, it <br />was sometimes misinterpreted as you will do this. She preferred a non - mandatory word <br />and suggested "should retain or can retain ". <br />City Attorney Light stated the words of "shall, will or strive" in a master plan document <br />will not be enforceable without subsequent ordinances. The language would not be <br />enforceable against the City for a legal action because it is not specific enough. He did <br />not feel the phrase would bring support to any legal action. <br />City Manager Fleming suggested striking the word "will" from the vision statement. It <br />would be visionary and inspirational while not forcing the effort. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated there are four goals. The third goal, Prioritizing <br />Projects includes the revolving loan, marketing to residents and businesses and helping <br />the public to find landmarked properties. She did not feel this goal is included in the <br />vision statement. She was not sure the properties will be prioritized with the limited <br />funding. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton had difficulties envisioning what will be in the Master Plan. He <br />asked staff to outline the elements of the plan. Planner I Trice explained they are still <br />working on the goals and policies, which will go into the plan. The subcommittee is <br />thinking about ideas on what will be in the plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.