Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 8, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 23 <br />BCHA development is estimated to result in approximately $150,000 in ongoing annual revenue <br />to the City and to generate approximately $264,000 ongoing annual expenditures. The result is a <br />net fiscal on -going operations balance of negative $114,000 annually. There is expected to be an <br />annual recurring revenue stream of $29,000 from sales tax revenue that is dedicated to capital <br />projects, open space, and historic preservation. Therefore, the total net on -going fiscal balance <br />will be negative by $85,000. The proposed development will have a net negative capital impact <br />based on the model factors. The development will impose $2,104,000 upon the City in demand <br />for new capital investments. The project is estimated to generate $1,340,000 in one -time <br />revenue. Thus, the net fiscal balance provides a one -time capital negative impact of $764,000. <br />Although there is not a large retail component to this project, EPS believes it will have a positive <br />impact on the Christopher Plaza commercial center at the northwest corner of South Boulder <br />Road and Hwy 42." <br />Additional outside communication: <br />Email to Planning Department from Alexandra Bradley recei . ' rt a dnesday, January 7, <br />2015 regarding BCHA Annexation and Rezoning Applicati• otio •e by Brauneis to enter <br />email into the record, seconded by Moline. Passed by vote. <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Russell asks about Hecla and whether there is ® °ic signal there. <br />Russ says there is no traffic signal at Hecla at thi e. It is . tersection. <br />Tengler asks about Planning Area A be'ng zoning co - not commercial /residential. Has <br />this changed. <br />Russ says in GDP, it should be Comm- T '•ential. L: inute fixes to the GDP and the <br />Staff Report may not have reflected it in gr. • : erence <br />Tengler asks about fiscal analysis. At wh- .•int do- thin " -gative fiscal balance <br />would have impacted the • - • for appr <br />Russ says it is not sole f any • - - ..? ent. Thi :CHA coming with a proposal. <br />Staff recognizes the •' - -ity of a • ..ble ho <br />Brauneis asks abou <br />assumes this is projec <br />address thi. ion. <br />Russ sa <br />actio <br />ro'ection. '_ 106% projection is concerning but he <br />ith City Council and BVSD will hopefully <br />of the projections materialize in the future, BVSD has several <br />. Old Town Louisville is difficult for BVSD to understand. <br />Molin <br />identifie <br />Russ says <br />partnership w <br />Highway 42 at <br />® about public <br />his location th <br />is the num <br />ulder C <br />rth <br />location. <br />Moline says this deve . ent has to be amended and added to the Takota GDP. Did the <br />Takota GDP have a limit on number of units? <br />Russ says it had a maximum. This property is too small to come in as an independent GDP so <br />it needs to be attached. It could have been attached to the Alvenus GDP (Balfour) or Takota or <br />Steel Ranch South. Staff thought the Takota was best. <br />Moline says although this is added to Takota GDP, does it not need to abide by unit limits? <br />Russ says it can be viewed as an amendment to that GDP particular to this parcel. <br />t <br />dedic= . > , is there a park site or trail corridor the Comp Plan <br />e community and staff would want? <br />f plans for the trail corridor (Lake to Lake Trail). Louisville has a <br />Transportation to set aside $600,000 for an underpass at <br />uadrant of this parcel. The Comp Plan does not identify a park <br />O'Connell asks if any of the adjacent property owners had any objections. <br />Russ says he has not heard of any objections. <br />