My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 02 10
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 02 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
3/4/2015 8:27:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 02 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 10, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />City Manager Fleming explained the management team was instructed to look at <br />the things used to make management decisions and how to evaluate services to <br />arrive at the key indicators. <br />Council members decided there was no need to go over each of these minutely. <br />They asked staff to look for detail specifics, to subtract judgments, make sure <br />indicators are quantitative /measurable and meet industry standards. <br />TRANSPORTATION: Planning and Engineering, Transportation Infrastructure <br />Maintenance, Snow and Ice Removal <br />Acceptable accessibility and mobility index, Mode split, % of trip types: <br />regional /local Acceptable accident rates; compliance with 001 and per capita <br />cost policy objectives; measured satisfaction levels; streets, trails plowed and <br />shoveled with XX hours. <br />UTILITIES: Compliance with all regulations; minimal complaints; competitive <br />prices; effective conservation of resources; measured satisfaction levels. <br />PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE: Everyone knows their neighbors; low crime <br />and Code violation rates; measured satisfaction levels. <br />PARKS: maintained to established criteria; maintain tree inventory; moving to <br />desired level of tree diversity; stable or declining cost per acre; measured <br />satisfaction levels. <br />OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS: Maintained to established criteria; cost per acre <br />and per mile; measured satisfaction levels; productive relationships with owners <br />of candidate properties. <br />RECREATION: Good participation rates; fees reflect adopted cost recovery; <br />facilities maintained to established criteria; measured satisfaction levels. <br />CULTURAL SERVICES: Good participation; relevant, accessible materials; <br />measured satisfaction levels. <br />COMMUNITY DESIGN: Measured satisfaction levels; Code compliance; fees <br />reflect costs; achievement of preservation goals. <br />ECONOMIC PROSPERITY: Vacancy rate; jobs per capita; resident filled jobs; <br />sales, construction, and consumer use tax revenue; Building Investment; <br />Economic indicators and trends. <br />ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES: Measured external and internal <br />satisfaction levels, participation rates; comparison to established benchmark <br />performance indicators and accomplishment of contributing projects /goals. <br />DISCUSSION /DIRECTION ON ROLE OF CONTRIBUTING PROJECTS <br />City Manager Fleming explained the list of contributing projects was presented as <br />examples of how they could be reflected in the programs. He asked if this <br />captures what Council would like to see in the budget. Council asked to see <br />them as projects and actions and felt it might be helpful to associate them even <br />in separate sheets or with the program areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.