My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 03 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 03 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:08 PM
Creation date
3/6/2015 11:34:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 03 03
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
696
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 17, 2015 <br />Page 10 of 20 <br />component is proposed to be sold to a non - profit plan and therefore would generate no <br />tax for the City. There would also be no influence over the hours of operation, fees or <br />access. He urged Council to reject this proposal. He stated if this project is built in <br />phases and is not built out immediately, it would not be the first project to do so. <br />John Leary, 1116 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO did not have a position on whether <br />the request should be approved or denied. His concern centered on the process <br />presented and on Council not having sufficient information to make a decision. He <br />addressed the comment that precedence is a major factor to consider this request. He <br />stated consistency is not always doing the same thing and presented an analogy of <br />consistency and fairness. He stated at one time there was a windfall from sales tax, but <br />now with the recession and long lists of projects, the fund balance is lower than it ever <br />has been. He voiced concern over the lack of taxes collected in this proposal and the <br />City's fund balance. He stated the $400,000 waiver of fees would have come out of the <br />unrestricted General Fund money, which would draw down the fund balance. He <br />stressed the importance of knowing all the information and the priorities before making <br />a decision. <br />Debby Fahey, 1118 W. Enclave Circle, Louisville, CO agreed with the statements made <br />by the previous speakers. She addressed the City's assistance to Lydia Morgan and <br />Sunnyside and noted the City was waiving fees to the Louisville Housing Authority and <br />not Boulder County. She stressed these affordable housing units will be built in <br />Louisville, but not necessarily for Louisville residents. She stated Boulder County cannot <br />provide for a Louisville residents preference. She reported being present at other <br />presentations on this project and noted none of the public comments were reflected in <br />the proposal or the design plan. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton commented the City has to look to its own interests. He stated <br />the proposal will provide additional residences, but residential property does not pay for <br />the services they require through property taxes. This project will not pay for any <br />services because it is a non - profit. He explained the assistance the City provided to <br />Lydia Morgan and Sunnyside afforded a Louisville resident preference however this <br />new project will not. The commercial buildings on the property will be non - profit and will <br />not generate any taxes for the services the City supplies. He felt the City is being asked <br />to subsidize a section of housing set aside for artists. He was opposed to subsidizing <br />one set of housing for a specific occupation. He noted the City's approval of business <br />assistance is predicated on a fiscal benefit to the City. He stated he was not in favor of <br />the proposal. <br />Council member Leh agreed with Mayor Pro Tem Dalton and noted in the staff report <br />there is a request for direction, but there is also a staff recommendation for what <br />Council could do. He asked what additional information is needed. <br />City Manager Fleming explained information needed to help Council and residents know <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.