My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 03 10 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 03 10 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
3/18/2015 10:17:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 03 10 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br />March 10, 2015 <br />Page 3of5 <br />Council member Leh inquired whether the rates could be averaged out over the next <br />five years as opposed to big increases in 2015 and 2016. Public Works Director Kowar <br />explained they have tried to smooth out the rate increase over a three year period. <br />Council member Stolzmann addressed the water rate structure and stated when the <br />existing rate structure was set up the Conoco Phillips property was using water; now <br />that is vacant, commercial water usage is down. Public Works Director Kowar <br />explained it will readjust itself. Public Works Director Kowar explained further the goal <br />is to review the Utility annually to ensure equitability and sustainability with utility rates. <br />In the event a very large user impacted current rate structures the City would consider <br />changes to realign cost of service impacts. <br />Council member Lipton felt the rate structures were asking a lot of the residents. He <br />stated it is becoming more and more difficult to explain the water rate increases to the <br />residents. He stated his preference to smooth out the utility rates even more. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton disagreed and stated in looking at the tables, the rate increases <br />are not a lot of money. <br />Council member Leh commented on the commercial rate structure and requested <br />clarification. Public Works Director Kowar explained there is an historic rate structure <br />for multi - family. <br />Council member Stolzmann commented on the sub -group for commercial. Public Work <br />Director Kowar explained Council member Stolzmann's comments were very accurate <br />and the demand curves for multifamily represented commercial more than residential. <br />Council member Lipton voiced his appreciation for Mayor Pro Tem Dalton's perspective, <br />however was frustrated at having to explain to the residents how the models will have to <br />be readjusted and felt he would just be changing the story. He wanted to smooth out <br />the hurt of the cost of the utility bill. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Tom Phare, 808 W. Mahogany Circle, Louisville, CO reported looking at all the data and <br />the cost of service. His interpretation of the data does not show the cost of service <br />equity is as far off as the consultant suggests. He asked if the wastewater rates take <br />the loan to the golf course into account. <br />Finance Director Watson confirmed the wastewater utility financial plan includes the <br />loan to the golf course. He stressed the importance of collecting the amount of revenue <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.