Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 3, 2015 <br />Page 7 of 24 <br />setbacks. There is also more residential planned in the Comprehensive Plan for the <br />South Boulder Road Area so knowing the housing types was important. In the <br />McCaslin /Centennial Valley Small Area Plan it is unclear whether there should be <br />housing and if so the densities. There should also be questions relative to transit stops. <br />Council member Lipton noted on South Boulder Road there is a lot of greenfield <br />development, where on McCaslin there is more redevelopment. He felt it was important <br />to get a sense about the Sam's Club area and have some focused questions on land <br />uses along McCaslin Boulevard. He felt on South Boulder Road the goal was to get <br />input on architectural style. He suggested some questions directly relating to the <br />redevelopment of certain areas stressed along McCaslin. <br />Planner II Robinson explained there are questions related to land uses, but they can be <br />formulated to ask specifics about housing. He reviewed the changes to the South <br />Boulder Road survey questions to reflect the different environment in the McCaslin <br />Boulevard corridor as follows: <br />• Changes in the uses described in questions 3 and 4. <br />• Addition of "Entertainment (theater)" in question 6. <br />• Combining medical offices and professional services into one item in questions 6 <br />• Addition of "Warehouse /Industrial flex space" in question 6 <br />• Addition of "Open space" in question 6 <br />• New photos for 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3D, 4C, 4D, 5C, 6A, 7B, 8A, 8B & 9A <br />to address McCaslin Boulevard contains larger parcel sizes and larger buildings <br />Council member Leh addressed the consideration of the Recreation Center in the study <br />area. He voiced his support for the Recreation Center inclusion in the McCaslin Small <br />Area Plan and felt they are geographically connected. Planning and Building Safety <br />Director Russ stated there would be a risk of not producing a successful small area plan <br />for McCaslin with the inclusion of the Recreation Center. He felt there should be a <br />comprehensive public discussion on the Recreation Center. He noted planning staff <br />does not have the resources to address an aquatics center or play fields. He agreed <br />they are interrelated geographically, but are two distinct plans of study. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed more information relative to pool and recreation centers is <br />needed. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO stated he was interested <br />if the City Council would support specific direction on two questions: 1) Rezoning all of <br />the Sam's Club property for mixed use. 2) Support for residential development in <br />Centennial Valley, modeled on the Steel Ranch development and would support <br />increase if there was age restriction for 55 +. <br />