My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 03 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 03 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
4/8/2015 8:33:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 03 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />M eeting Minutes: <br />March 17, 2015 <br />Page 19 of 31 <br />VOTE: Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 6 -1.. Council member <br />Loo voted no. <br />RESOLUTION No. 13, SERIES 2015 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN <br />ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR THE 245 NORTH 96TH STREET ANNEXATION <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/ACTION — LOCAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO <br />SUPPORT BOULDER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY'S (BCHA) <br />AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT AT 245 NORTH 96TH STREET <br />COUNCIL. COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann addressed the financial agreement. With respect to the <br />County's 20% contribution to the trail system trail, she was comfortable waiving 100% of <br />the fee if it could be tied to the underpass on Highway 42 and considered a local match. <br />She felt through the agreement more of the parks and trails fees could be modified by <br />100 % as a local match. She felt this would be more reasonable for the housing project <br />and for the surrounding homes. She would be comfortable moving 50% of the municipal <br />facilities fee if Louisville residents would be allowed to use the project's public facilities. <br />She was comfortable with 100% of the transportation fee as the contribution to Highway <br />42.. She addressed the building permit fees and street construction. She understood <br />the building fees would be backfilled by unrestricted General Fund revenue, but wanted <br />a priority of project, which would be delayed. She was uncomfortable building a street <br />for a development and suggestion contributions could be increased on some of the <br />other components. She did not want the public to have to wait fora building permit <br />because staff is tied up with this project <br />Economic Development Director DeJong explained large projects such as this do not <br />require hiring more building department staff, but there would be an increase to the <br />workload. He noted there are line items in the Building Safety budget to take care of <br />additional inspections and construction plan reviews. <br />Council member Stolzmann did not want staff to say they can handle this, but the level <br />of service would be unacceptable. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ <br />explained the North Main Project was a 220 apartment development, which came in at <br />the height of Steel Ranch and the North End continuing their developments. He noted <br />the North Main Project was delivered on time. The building staff was not affected by the <br />220 unit apartment development. <br />Council member Stolzmann noted her concern was for delaying residents seeking <br />simple building and fence permit and whose fees will not be waived. She was looking at . <br />the needs of the building staff if this project is pursued. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.