Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 7, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 25 <br />dedication. Council may direct staff on which fund should pay for the land dedication. <br />Staff believed this dedication from the Enterprise Fund meets the obligation for the City. <br />City Manager Fleming explained the LMC requires platting for park or other public <br />purposes. Council could determine this is a park service or that no dedication is <br />required as it is already public land. He explained this could be a land dedication of <br />12% or a monetary contribution. <br />Council member Loo stated residents are paying a water treatment fee, which would be <br />used to fund trails. She opposed the Enterprise Fund being used to fund trails. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ staff walked the facility grounds and <br />discussed three alignments. He explained 10 %, depending on the alignment would be <br />a financial contribution and 90% would be for the land dedication. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Stolzmann felt this was a misinterpretation of the Louisville Municipal <br />Code for public use. She supported Council member Loo's comments and did not see <br />the need to increase water bills any further. She felt the trails should be discussed as a <br />capital project within the trails planning, to determine priority. She did not believe the <br />Plat should include a land dedication. Mayor Pro Tem Dalton supported the plat and <br />the dedication, but felt the cash in -lieu should not be from the Enterprise Fund. <br />Council member Ley agreed.. He addressed the aesthetics of the site and inquired <br />whether trees would be added to buffer the drying beds from the roadway. Planning <br />and Building Safety Director Russ explained staff worked with the Parks Department on <br />the landscaping, which is currently prairie land. There are not a lot of visible areas from <br />Marshall Road and the drying beds would be invisible from the roadway. <br />Council member Lipton inquired whether there will be any emissions of odors from the <br />drying beds. Public Works Director Kowar stated there would not be any odor with a <br />clean water facility. <br />Council member Lipton agreed with other Council members that the land dedication <br />should not be paid by the Water Enterprise Fund and suggested Open Space funding. <br />Mayor Muckle inquired whether Council would like to leave in a flexible land use <br />dedication. Mayor Pro Tem Dalton suggested removing the land dedication and stating <br />the intent to have a trail connecting to other properties and paid through other funds <br />Council member Stolzmann agreed the land dedication should be left out. She felt <br />there may be a trail connection alignment through the County's property instead of <br />along the .road. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ stated the Resolution could be revised to <br />read if "public assess is needed ". The language on the Plat would have to be revised <br />because it is not a publically accessible site. Taking out the 12% condition would meet <br />