My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 04 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 04 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
4/22/2015 7:53:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 04 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 7, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 25 <br />dedication. Council may direct staff on which fund should pay for the land dedication. <br />Staff believed this dedication from the Enterprise Fund meets the obligation for the City. <br />City Manager Fleming explained the LMC requires platting for park or other public <br />purposes. Council could determine this is a park service or that no dedication is <br />required as it is already public land. He explained this could be a land dedication of <br />12% or a monetary contribution. <br />Council member Loo stated residents are paying a water treatment fee, which would be <br />used to fund trails. She opposed the Enterprise Fund being used to fund trails. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ staff walked the facility grounds and <br />discussed three alignments. He explained 10 %, depending on the alignment would be <br />a financial contribution and 90% would be for the land dedication. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Stolzmann felt this was a misinterpretation of the Louisville Municipal <br />Code for public use. She supported Council member Loo's comments and did not see <br />the need to increase water bills any further. She felt the trails should be discussed as a <br />capital project within the trails planning, to determine priority. She did not believe the <br />Plat should include a land dedication. Mayor Pro Tem Dalton supported the plat and <br />the dedication, but felt the cash in -lieu should not be from the Enterprise Fund. <br />Council member Ley agreed.. He addressed the aesthetics of the site and inquired <br />whether trees would be added to buffer the drying beds from the roadway. Planning <br />and Building Safety Director Russ explained staff worked with the Parks Department on <br />the landscaping, which is currently prairie land. There are not a lot of visible areas from <br />Marshall Road and the drying beds would be invisible from the roadway. <br />Council member Lipton inquired whether there will be any emissions of odors from the <br />drying beds. Public Works Director Kowar stated there would not be any odor with a <br />clean water facility. <br />Council member Lipton agreed with other Council members that the land dedication <br />should not be paid by the Water Enterprise Fund and suggested Open Space funding. <br />Mayor Muckle inquired whether Council would like to leave in a flexible land use <br />dedication. Mayor Pro Tem Dalton suggested removing the land dedication and stating <br />the intent to have a trail connecting to other properties and paid through other funds <br />Council member Stolzmann agreed the land dedication should be left out. She felt <br />there may be a trail connection alignment through the County's property instead of <br />along the .road. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ stated the Resolution could be revised to <br />read if "public assess is needed ". The language on the Plat would have to be revised <br />because it is not a publically accessible site. Taking out the 12% condition would meet <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.