My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 04 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 04 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:23:42 PM
Creation date
5/1/2015 10:06:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A5
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 04 21
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 7, 2015 <br />Page 11 of 26 <br />number of affordable housing units. He felt the impacts about density and traffic would <br />be addressed. He was disappointed the issues did not get resolved earlier. <br />Council member Stolzmann supported the project because of the changes made. She <br />suggested in the future, if all information is not available, the matter be delayed. She <br />understood the urgency to get the federal funds. <br />Mayor Muckle asked City Attorney Light to address the clauses in the agreement, which <br />prohibit the financial assistance from being used in the market rate housing project. <br />City Attorney Light explained the Financial Assistance Agreement stipulates Building <br />Permit Fee and Impact Fee Rebates are provided only for affordable units and <br />affordable units is defined as income and age restricted. Also the income and age <br />restrictive project excludes market rate units. <br />Council member Lipton inquired whether there could be a condition in the resolution, <br />which stipulates Louisville's public funds cannot be used for the project's private <br />component. City Attorney Light stated it could be stated through a recital or a condition <br />of intent, but if Council wants to add language that the County agrees to abide by, it <br />should be added in the contract. <br />RESOLUTION No. 17, SERIES 2015 <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 17, Series 2015, and direct <br />the City Attorney and authorize the Mayor to sign a resolution with an intent clause, <br />which provides the City's public money will not be used for market based housing, <br />seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. <br />City Attorney Light offered the following revisions to the resolution: 1) Add a new fourth <br />to last Whereas clause to read as follows: WHEREAS, the City Council intends and the <br />Agreement provides that such assistance is limited in use to support the construction <br />and long -term affordability of affordable units and age- restricted units and not to be <br />used for development or other costs for units that are not affordable or age- restricted <br />units. 2) Add a new number 1 in the body of resolution after the Now, Therefore clause <br />and renumber items 1 -4 to 2 -5. The new item 1 would read as follows: 1. The foregoing <br />recitals are incorporated herein and made a part of this Resolution. <br />Council member Lipton noted Exhibit A should be "A copy of the Financial Agreement" <br />instead of a "Business Assistance Agreement ". <br />VOTE: Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 6 -0. Absent: Council <br />member Keany. <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.