My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 04 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 04 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:23:42 PM
Creation date
5/1/2015 10:06:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A5
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 04 21
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 7, 2015 <br />Page 13 of 26 <br />use does not make it mixed use. He addressed the theory of live, work and play in the <br />same area and he noted very few people who live in Louisville actually work in <br />Louisville. He felt the Council must be upfront with the public and not put abstract <br />concepts questions in the survey, such as those that were included in the South Boulder <br />Road Survey. He did not feel it was honest. <br />Sid Vinall, 544 Leader Circle, Louisville, CO voiced his appreciation for the surveys <br />because they provide public feedback, which helps Council to make decision on the <br />Small Area Plans. He stated the McCaslin Boulevard Small Area Plan survey questions <br />must be concise, short and sweet. He made suggestions on revising some of the <br />questions. He felt question seven was long and wordy and suggested making it shorter <br />and more concise. He also felt some of the concepts are difficult for the average <br />resident to understand. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Muckle requested staff respond to the public comments. <br />Planner II Robinson explained the South Boulder Road Survey questions results are <br />available on the City's web site. They are also included in the March 3rd City Council <br />packet and in the April 9th Planning Commission packet. The results were also <br />presented at the February public meeting. <br />Mixed Uses: Planner II Robinson explained the concept of live /work in mixed use, <br />combines living and working space in the same unit. Work share is a term for informal <br />office space for short term or long term for multiple businesses and mixed use combines <br />different uses. He noted those concepts came from question number six. He stated <br />staff is open to suggestions on making those terms clearer. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Sid Vinall, 544 Leader Circle, Louisville, CO inquired when the results of the South <br />Boulder Road survey would be reviewed. Planner II Robinson stated the South Boulder <br />Road Small Area Plan survey questions would be reviewed at the April 9, 2015 <br />Planning Commission meeting. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann suggested reassessing what they want to get out of the <br />survey. Council wanted community input on the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan <br />process and the questions asked were to ensure Council was going in the right <br />direction. She thought the purpose of the survey was to present a framework for all of <br />the different scenarios, which would provide different options. She was not sure the first <br />survey was of value and did not feel these survey questions would provide more <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.