My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 05 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:08 PM
Creation date
6/2/2015 9:40:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A5
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 05 19
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
658
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 5, 2015 <br />Page 9 of 33 <br />Council member Leh disclosed one of his wife's legal clients is Comcast. He recused <br />himself and left the room. <br />Council member Stolzmann felt residents would be upset if Comcast was not granted a <br />franchise. She was interested in looking at effective competition sometime in the future. <br />She felt it may provide a way to assist low income and seniors by having the City control <br />the basic cable packages. <br />Council member Lipton commended the negotiation team on their work. He noted it is <br />difficult to negotiate with all the limitations prescribed from the federal jurisdictions. He <br />stated Council must be realistic on what can and cannot be done. He was comfortable <br />moving forward with approving the franchise agreement. Mayor Muckle concurred. <br />Council member Lipton commented over the next decade the technologies will change <br />and there will be more options available to Louisville residents in terms of how they <br />receive broadband and internet. He felt the City should review the ordinances on cell <br />towers and antennas to ensure the community is prepared to adopt and accept some of <br />the new technologies in the future. This would give Comcast more competition. <br />Mayor Muckle inquired whether the PEG fees will be enough to support Channel 8 and <br />any other channels. Public Relations Manager Muth stated the PEG fees will be <br />sufficient enough to support Channel 8. She reported hearing there may be a request <br />for Channel 54 (public) funding. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if there is precedence for changing the PEG fee rate if or when <br />another public channel requests funding. Special Counsel Nancy Rodgers explained <br />the PEG fees are not established by channel. The 50 cents per household is fairly <br />standard for this fee. She had not seen anyone negotiate an additional PEG feey <br />Andy Davis, Comcast Director of Governmental Affairs explained PEG fees are specific <br />for equipment and hardware. It is not for operations. If there was a point when the City <br />wanted to revisit the PEG fees, Comcast would be willing to discuss. <br />Mayor Muckle called for public comment and hearing none, closed the public hearing. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton thanked Council member Lipton for his comments and <br />expressed his appreciation to Meredyth Muth and Nancy Rodgers for their work on the <br />franchise negotiations. He noted, even though Comcast was slow in responding to the <br />teams' questions, they did respond and he thanked Andy Davis also. <br />ORDINANCE No. 1685, SERIES 2015 <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.