My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 05 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:08 PM
Creation date
6/2/2015 9:40:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A5
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 05 19
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
658
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 5, 2015 <br />Page 12 of 33 <br />Council member Stolzmann commented she did not favor a fence at 25' out. She did <br />not see the benefit. She asked when the financial options are brought back she would <br />like to see the Urban Renewal Authority provide money to address some of the cost <br />overruns. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if the agreement with Urban Renewal Authority is they will pay for <br />half of the cost of the underpass. Economic Development Director DeJong stated the <br />agreement is for the Louisville Revitalization Commission (LRC) to pay for half of the <br />cost outside the stormwater improvements projects. If it is greater than the $1.3 Million <br />Dollars, the LRC will review the cost increase. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Sherry Sommers, 910 S. Palisade Court, Louisville, CO stated her understanding there <br />would be benefits, trails easements, urban renewal funding, but inquired why this <br />particular spot was chosen, when there are other competing intersections that appears <br />to have more traffic. <br />Randy Caranci, 441 Elk Trail, Louisville, CO reported meeting with City Manager <br />Fleming this afternoon. He was still not sure where the negotiations currently are in <br />connection with his lease. He noted he has a 28' setback from his building to the east. <br />He would be giving up 3' if this fence goes forward. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained in the negotiations with the <br />railroad, the Caranci property was never represented because the City was <br />representing downtown interests. The agreement with Caranci and Hartronft was a <br />common interest to make the railroad parking (easement parking) as large as possible. <br />There is not a lease agreement in terms of the land, as the City did not want to <br />renegotiate the Caranci lease with the railroad. <br />Randy Caranci asked that the City keep them informed with respect to the railroad <br />negotiations. He stated the City Manager assured him there were no negotiations, just <br />emails and phone calls. He stated his understanding this is for the South Street <br />Underpass. He was asked last year to give up his lease to get additional parking. He <br />stated the setback from the centerline of the railroad tracks running south from <br />Caledonia Street to Pine Street is 18', but from Pine Street south it is 25'. His current <br />lease allows for a 22' setback. He would be giving up 3'. He wanted to see this project <br />move forward. They hope to be part of discussions and City Manager Fleming has <br />agreed to keep them informed. <br />Bruce MacKenzie, 1612 Cottonwood Drive, Louisville, CO inquired about the cost of this <br />project for the City of Louisville. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.