Laserfiche WebLink
program. The total issue is rated AAA and the bonds <br />are insured. <br />Other goals of the water system, along with lower <br />interest rates, include building adequate fund <br />balances, creating some equity among rate payers, <br />and over time, hope that the municipal market will <br />allow the City to finance this debt close to the <br />useful life of the facility. The issues that are <br />not included in this refinancing are two Farmers <br />Home Loans that go for forty years and a Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board loan that goes forty years. <br />The length of the debt, the City's credit quality, <br />how rate-payer equity is achieved, are among the <br />things to be considered in re-structuring the City's <br />water debt structure. Mr. Caldwell detailed the <br />basics of this refinancing including the extra <br />$500,000 balance that will occur in this fund over <br />the next 5-years. "This improves your credit <br />quality in the event that you have a need for those <br />fund -- they will available to you." <br />Caldwell stated that in stretching the debt out <br />closer to the useful life, there is an increased <br />interest cost over the life, but re-financing <br />creates rate payer equity. "There is a slight <br />present value cost, when you look at the present <br />value stream, of about $114,000." <br />Tom Davidson, 611 W. Chestnut, addressed Council <br />stating that he looked into the re-financing of the <br />water debt and found that principle and interest <br />payoff for this proposed debt if held to maturity <br />would amount to $12.6 million after re-financing the <br />$4.8 million, plus adding in the $813,000 in new <br />bonds would then amount to $15.4 million or a <br />$2,776,454 increase. "That doesn't sound like a <br />savings -- that sounds like an expense," Davidson <br />stated. He then asked about the refinancing costs <br />which appears to be about $213,000. Mr. Davidson <br />stated that these figures don't include attorney <br />costs. "In the long run, it increases the City's <br />water costs for the bonds by over 22$." <br />Mr. Caldwell stated that the legal fees have been <br />addressed in a separate line item called "issuance <br />costs" that are paid to Lamm Edstrom as bond counsel <br />and amounts to approximately $20,000. <br />Mohr reasoned that to issue these bonds to is create <br />the availability of funds to acquire large blocks of <br />water rights and the other reason to issue these <br />bonds is to create equity to all rate payers. The <br />cost of issue is to be spread over both existing and <br />