Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 26, 2015 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />revisit the subject or decide on a different date, however, there is a risk of a gap if dates <br />are changed and in the best practices for historical preservation. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated his understanding, wanted to ensure residents are not <br />overburdened by the process. Planner I Trice explained there are a variety of ways to <br />expedite the process for residents. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ stated he finds the public hearing important <br />for information gathering. More information can come forward on the historical <br />significance which can be relevant to the owner or the HPC in making decisions. He <br />said there have been concerns that the process drags on after the hearing and can feel <br />punitive to the applicant. Does the timeframe need to be examined. <br />Council member Leh felt a date certain would help residents and should provide <br />guidance for the staff. He was concerned a rolling date created more confusion than it <br />resolves. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ suggested staff come back with a <br />pro /con list for a rolling date program and a fixed date program. <br />Council member Loo addressed the tract home developments in Louisville. She did not <br />want to commit residents to come before a historic commission to remodel their homes. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton noted historic Old Town and Downtown Louisville is the result of <br />many years of change. He did not feel this would work the same in the suburban parts <br />of the City. <br />Planner I Trice explained there are misconceptions about historic preservation. It does <br />not require every property modification to come before the Historic Preservation <br />Commission. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ stated the plan does not dictate styles or <br />involuntary process; it allows residents to make informed decisions by providing <br />information. Planner I Trice said at the workshops there were residents concerned <br />about neighbors being able to demolish homes without a public process and residents <br />interested in voluntarily landmarking their properties. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton requested staff provide fixed dates and rationale for those dates <br />and rationale for the rolling year period. <br />Council member Loo stated there has not been a lot of involvement by the residents <br />living in tract homes with the historic preservation process. She stressed the importance <br />of educating the homeowners. <br />Council member Lipton supported Mayor Pro Tem Dalton's suggestion to ask for the <br />analysis. Mayor Muckle noted he felt Council had given direction to staff to lay out both <br />options; date certain and rolling. <br />