My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2015 06 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2015 06 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:12 PM
Creation date
6/29/2015 10:52:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2015 06 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> As stated above, this property has an irregular lot shape, with a narrow frontage (67 feet) <br />and a wider rear lot line (129 feet). Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />2. That the unusual circumstances or conditions do not exist throughout the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located. <br /> <br /> <br />The above graphic is a scan of the Louisville North Filing #1 subdivision plat, specific to <br />the RE portion of the subdivision. The property, 2146 Garfield, is shown as Lot 162. <br />There are other properties in the neighborhood with a narrow frontage a wider rear lot line; <br />however Lot 162 is the only property along Garfield with that condition. Additionally, the <br />other homes in the neighborhood with similar conditions are located on cul-de-sacs with <br />deeper lots. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />3. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot <br />reasonably be developed in conformity with the provisions of Title 17 of the <br />Louisville Municipal Code. <br /> <br />Upon inspection of the drawings and a field visit to the property, staff believes this <br />requested addition could not be reasonably designed to not encroach into the side yard <br />setback. The applicant cannot shift the two car garage addition to the north without <br />misaligning the new entry with the central space of the house. Also, grade differences in <br />the yard and existing retaining wall limit the single car addition from shifting slightly to the <br />east. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />4. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the applicant. <br /> The combination of the irregularity of the property and the internal structure of the house is <br />limiting the compliance with the setback regulations. The applicant did not create either <br />hardship. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />5. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or <br />permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.