My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 03 11
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2008 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 03 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:36:17 AM
Creation date
4/3/2008 2:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
5F6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2008 03 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Study Session Summary <br /> March 11, 2008 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> Louisville property names, statistics such as demographics, income, and age, <br /> section 8 statistics and the Boulder County Housing Needs Assessment 2005 <br /> Report. <br /> Executive Director Alexander stated that the properties were in good standing <br /> financially and had gone through modernization projects. He said the property <br /> on E Street is more of challenge financially because of the number of units and <br /> the second mortgage. He said that the City should consider building senior <br /> housing in the revitalization area and focus on upgrades to existing housing, an <br /> inclusionary ordinance, affordable home ownership and affordable rentals. <br /> Councilor Dalton asked how many more units are needed in Louisville. Executive <br /> Director Alexander said that information would be part of the City's <br /> Comprehensive Plan but usually it is 10% in each community. <br /> Councilor Sackett said that if the community consensus is to provide more <br /> affordable housing then the City needs to give support and devise a plan that <br /> gives incentives to developers. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Marsella said that the City Council has consistently supported <br /> affordable housing projects. <br /> Councilor Dalton asked if it would be possible for the City to buy land for <br /> affordable housing through another revenue stream such as taxes. Mayor Pro <br /> Tem Marsella said that she did not think that would work. <br /> Councilor Muckle asked if new housing should be required to incorporate <br /> affordable units. Mayor Pro Tem Marsella said that the existing number of <br /> rentals units seems sufficient. <br /> Councilor Muckle asked if an option could be the City used the proposed <br /> historical preservation tax to purchase the small historical houses in the <br /> downtown area for affordable home ownership. Mayor Pro Tem Marsella stated <br /> that past history has shown that combined ballot issues do not do well. <br /> City Manager Fleming said that this discussion was a good segway into the <br /> Historic Preservation Tax agenda item. <br /> <br /> 4. Discussion -Potential Ballot Question on Historic Preservation Tax <br /> Councilor Muckle said the use tax designation could be for historical preservation <br /> and the Arts and, to compensate, the current arts funding taken out of the <br /> general fund budget. <br /> Councilor Dalton stated that his understanding of the use tax was to even out the <br /> sales tax fluctuations. He thought the tax should be presented to voters to see if <br /> the majority of the Louisville residents are willing to pay a tax to ensure historic <br /> preservation in Louisville. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.