My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 06 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 06 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
7/15/2015 11:11:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 06 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 2, 2015 <br />Page 18 of 27 <br />Mayor Muckle felt the last constraint `lack of community consensus" was what the plan <br />was trying to accomplish. <br />Measures of Success <br />• Principle 1 Improve connectivity and accessibility while accommodating regional <br />transportation needs. <br />a) Increase the network connectivity of roads parallel to McCaslin Blvd <br />i) Are vehicles able to move between parcels without returning to <br />McCaslin Blvd? <br />b) Make sure traffic passing through the corridor does not make it an undesirable <br />place to live, work, play, and travel <br />i) Does traffic noise decrease? <br />ii)Do pedestrians and bicyclists feel safe? <br />iii)How long will a trip take on the corridor? <br />c) Accommodate future regional transportation plans <br />i) How does the corridor alternative adequately address future' <br />transportation needs? <br />ii)How does the corridor alternative accommodate adopted regional transit <br />plans? <br />d) Provide wayfinding to locations within and outside the corridor <br />i) Are visitors able to find key destinations and locations in the study area? <br />ii)Are visitors able to find connections to key destination outside the study <br />area, such as Downtown? <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann wanted to add how commuters coming into the community <br />get from the bus to work and around during the day. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ suggested adding the "final mile ". How <br />accessible is the station, to and from, and hit the key aspects. He asked if Council <br />member Stolzmann was seeing an increase of connectivity with the existing uses. <br />Council member Stolzmann confirmed she was concemed about commuters in and out <br />and noted it could be separated into final mile and parking. <br />Council member Keany asked about. 1.a "increasing connectivity". Planning and <br />Building Safety Director Russ noted this could be through redevelopment which would <br />have Tess impact on property rights and would be one of the measures to test against. <br />Mayor Muckle saw this as coming through redevelopment or something mutually <br />beneficial to the businesses, property owners and the community. <br />• Principle 2 — Create public and private gathering spaces to meet the needs of <br />residents, employees, and visitors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.