Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 2, 2015 <br />Page 5 of 27 <br />the a. llowed shows all of those. They have not gone through the development review <br />process but are allowed by the zoning in place. <br />Council member Loo wanted to get a handle on anything and everything that could <br />come before Council. There was an exercise years ago where zoning was looked at <br />and calculations were then done to determine how many possibilities you would have <br />Planning and Building Safety Directly Russ stated that is shown in "Currently allowed ". <br />Council member Keany asked about the Cottonwood Condos and townhouses around <br />Cottonwood Park and wondered if someone bought out each owner how many <br />additional units could be developed. The answer was 20. <br />Council member Keany inquired what zoning changes would take place with this plan. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ noted the small area plan would give a land <br />use vision and if there were zoning change recommendations staff would proceed to <br />suggest changes to the Municipal Code. There are land use scenarios for each <br />alternative. Council member Keany noted most developments do not fill to the <br />maximum allowed density and wondered if there was planning industry percentage to <br />determine potential to actual. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ wasn't aware <br />of an industry standard. <br />Council member Lipton asked to look at the proposed alternatives and what the <br />conditional implies. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ noted it would be vetted <br />throughout the process but based on what the community saw as important. Incentives <br />to developers could be used to add other amenities to the City. He referred to the land <br />use assumptions; residential shows only the floor height as conditional. General office <br />then gave a potential 50% discount to residential, less than half the units being shown <br />are conditional. Council member Lipton wanted to make sure they are accounted for <br />with assumptions. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ noted they are with an <br />assumed 50% discount. Council member Lipton noted with the alternatives considered <br />there would be 2 story and no more than 3 story buildings. <br />City Manager Fleming noted the only way conditional criteria would be granted would be <br />if Council felt it was merited. Land use description shows conditions as proposed. <br />Senior, live /work, affordable housing, fiscal performance, limited impact on view sheds <br />and shadows and /or public realm improvements. Special merits could lead to approval <br />of conditional criteria for additional floors. <br />Council member Keany asked about affordable senior housing opposed to senior <br />housing. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ noted staff is not asking for a vote <br />on the conditions tonight and will work with Council to vet a very deliberate process. <br />This presents the concept and the logic to the discount. He agreed the community has <br />asked for affordable senior housing. <br />