My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 07 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 07 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:18 PM
Creation date
7/22/2015 3:02:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2015 07 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 15, 2015 <br />Page 2 of 14 <br />was converted form residential to commercial as most of the structures <br />along Main Street. She stated the architectural integrity is interesting. In the <br />2000 Architectural Survey it was stated to not have any architectural <br />integrity due to alterations to the facade and additions to the east side of the <br />building. She stated the front porch has been reopened and believes the <br />original form has been maintained. She states staff has found probable <br />cause due to geographic integrity and social significance. <br />Julie Williams, owner of the property, is looking to modify the property. She <br />would like to add onto the property by at least 1,000 SF, with hopes of <br />placing a residence on the second floor. She is interested to see if the <br />modifications are possible to the structure. <br />Public Comments — None heard. <br />Koertje asked Williams how she envisions the addition. <br />Williams stated the front of the structure could be moved closer to the front <br />property line and the addition would be located in the rear of the structure. <br />She understands the foundation needs to be addressed because it is dirt. <br />Her original inspector of the structure, at time of purchase, was a structural <br />engineer. <br />Watson asked if there were any major structural modifications envisioned to <br />the original structure. <br />Williams said there would need to be because the structure is not very <br />stable. <br />Watson asked if she checked to see how viable the structure is if it didn't <br />have a foundation. <br />Williams stated she would need to do further research. <br />Echohawk asked if the 1,000 SF was added to the back, would the first floor <br />remain commercial. <br />Williams stated it would remain commercial. <br />Stewart stated he feels this appears more like a pre - filing conference than a <br />probable cause review. He then asked staff why the structure is being <br />considered for a commercial HSA if the structure was originally a residential <br />structure. <br />Trice stated this structure is zoned commercial and qualifies for the $6,000 <br />HSA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.