My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 07 28
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 07 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
8/19/2015 9:46:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 07 28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 28, 2015 <br />Page 11 of 28 <br />McManus has said he wishes to make investments in the property. Mr. McManus is <br />paying a fair price for the property. Mayor Pro Tem Dalton felt this sale is in the best <br />interest of the City. <br />Council member Leh voiced his appreciation for the public comments. He would <br />support this sales contract for the following reasons: The Council does have an <br />obligation to exercise discretion, but the money is not the most important aspect. He <br />stressed the importance of maintaining the small town character. Council supports <br />homegrown businesses and would not take away from those businesses. These <br />businesses have value and provide a community gathering place. He agreed with <br />Council member Loo the City is not losing money. The Council is not real estate <br />speculators; they are making a business transaction in the best interest of the City. <br />Council member Stolzmann expressed her appreciation for the public and Council <br />members' comments. She felt the Council has a responsibility for getting a fair value for <br />the sale of the property. She agreed Council should consider the intangibles, which <br />cannot be measured in money, but stressed the importance of understanding what is <br />being left on the table. She felt it would be helpful to get a current appraisal and <br />continue to negotiate with Mr. McManus to get a fair price for the sale. The City has <br />another offer for $250,000 more, and a well- respected realtor with commercial <br />experience has said the offer is $1.555 Million off. She referred to the City's Internal <br />Purchasing Policy on the Disposal of Surplus Property and stated if the City deviates <br />from their internal policy, it must be very deliberate and thoughtful on what is to be <br />accomplished. To ensure Sweet Cow and Lucky Pie remains on the property, Council <br />must consider the other factors on the investment and make sure the City is negotiating <br />strongly and not leaving significant items on the table. She felt she has not received <br />sufficient information to demonstrate the City is getting an appropriate price for the <br />property and a current appraisal would be helpful. She did not feel the public had an <br />opportunity to speak on the whole property. Overall, she did not feel she had enough <br />information to proceed with the sale as proposed. She noted she has heard good <br />things about the two businesses and her no vote is not a reflection of the businesses, <br />but felt the Council had to be responsible with public funds. <br />Mayor Muckle voiced his belief the public use of the site is very important as is the <br />sense of community. He agreed with the community the property should be in the hands <br />of the current business owners. He felt the sale price was fair and the City has a <br />working model of successful businesses. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Laurence Verbeck, 930 Parkview Street, Louisville, CO addressed the comments <br />relative to job creation and noted other uses can create jobs. He stated a comment was <br />made in reference to the City not losing money, but actually the City is losing money <br />with a discounted lease. He addressed the aspect of fairness and felt the Council was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.