Laserfiche WebLink
light of the outcome of the election and the passage of Amendment <br />1. The Northern District has re-evaluated some aspects of the <br />project and has asked other people whether they would be interested <br />in participating. The District adopted a policy change that would <br />allow participants to potentially meet their obligations to the <br />District by payments from sources other than tax levies, in order <br />to comply with the Amendment 1 requirements. He stated that the <br />District is moving forward with the project and Amendment 1 is not <br />going to prohibit the Project from moving forward. Because of its <br />contract with the City of Broomfield for the base capacity in this <br />pipeline, it needs to move forward on a fairly stringent time line. <br />He stated that the District has established a deadline of January <br />31, 1993, for potential participants to execute some kind of an <br />agreement committing to participation with appropriate <br />contingencies in this project. He explained that they have been <br />negotiating with the District and their attorneys to arrive at a <br />proposed contract structure to recommend to Council. Shimmin <br />stated that if the participants have agreed by January 31, 1993, <br />then the Northern District Board will make decisions at their <br />February 12, 1993, meeting concerning the alignment of the <br />pipeline. He explained that if the alignment goes east, the costs <br />go up for Louisville to the point where it's probably not <br />affordable. If it stays west, the costs are affordable. He stated <br />that after the decision on February 12, 1993, it will move into <br />final design. This summer bid documents will be prepared and by <br />December 1, 1993, they're anticipating a bid opening. The contract <br />will be awarded and construction will take place during 1994 and <br />1995. He went on to review the agreement (SEE ATTACHED). He <br />explained that the District, itself, is not promising that the <br />project can be built for the numbers that are in the estimates. It <br />has the right to terminate the project at any point, if certain <br />events occur, which are described in paragraph 8. He stated that <br />in paragraph 14 there is a provision that contemplates, subsequent <br />to this agreement, the execution of another contract, which is <br />referred to as the allotment contract. He explained that this is <br />an interim agreement that will get the City from here to the <br />decision to go ahead with construction. Once that decision is <br />made, then the City would need to execute a supplemental allotment <br />contract, which will govern the City's obligation to pay the <br />ongoing costs of operating and maintaining the pipeline after it's <br />built. Shimmin stated that he's worked with the District to work <br />this out in a flexible way. That agreement hasn't yet been <br />negotiated, but he contemplates that it will be negotiated between <br />now and August 1, 1993. Because of some Amendment 1 potential <br />concerns, that even though it may be negotiated by August 1, that <br />it would not have to be executed until the time the City moves <br />forward with construction to allow time for any elections that <br />might have to occur under Amendment 1. Shimmin pointed out the <br />risk factors involved: <br /> <br />1.) <br /> <br />Between the time when the first set of contingencies are <br />fulfilled and bid opening, that the project is simply <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />