Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 1, 2015 <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />Mayor Muckle explained the definitions Ms. Sommers questioned were directly from the <br />State Statute. He agreed not all the categories of blight are relevant to the site, but not <br />all of the blight factors have to be met. He stated the Plan is a step in a process and not <br />a final conclusion. He stated a there is no question the vacancy of the site has had a <br />negative effect on the area. He felt it was time to take a step toward resolving the <br />problem. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated he has voiced his objection to this process in the past, <br />and planned to vote no on the resolution. <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann stated this has been a long difficult process and noted the <br />property has been found to be blighted. The majority of the residents have an <br />expectation the Council should do something to remove the blight. It hurts people's <br />morale because it is an eyesore and it is not being used to its full utilization. She felt <br />adopting an urban renewal plan is a step in the right direction and she looked forward to <br />seeing what the plan will bring. <br />Mayor Muckle stated the Louisville Revitalization Commission (LRC) will assist in <br />developing a plan. The LRC is currently working on the urban renewal plan for Highway <br />42, and their experience will be beneficial for the Council and the community. <br />Council member Leh stated the City Council found the property to be blighted and <br />constituents agree the City should do something about it. He felt an urban renewal plan <br />is a step in the right direction. He was prepared to vote for the Plan and give the LRC <br />the full tool kit available to them to remedy the blight. <br />RESOLUTION No. 58, SERIES 2015 <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 58, Series 2015, as <br />amended, seconded by Council member Keany. <br />City Attorney Light clarified the motion is for approval of Resolution No. 58, Series 2015, <br />with the amendments to the plan which were included in the revised plan in the City <br />Council packet. <br />VOTE: The motion passed by a vote of 6 -1. Mayor Pro Tem Dalton voted no. <br />RESOLUTION No. 59, SERIES 2015 <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 59, Series 2015, seconded <br />by Council memberStolzmann. The motion passed by a vote of 6 -1. Mayor Pro Tem <br />Dalton voted no. <br />