My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 09 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 09 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:01 PM
Creation date
9/17/2015 8:50:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 09 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 1, 2015 <br />Page 17 of 18 <br />City Attomey Light stated the City Clerk will certify the City's ballot for the November 3, <br />2015 election on Friday, September 4th. He reported the new urban renewal legislation <br />affects the size of an urban renewal board and also changes the dynamics on the TIF <br />provision. He asked if Council had any questions relative to the new urban renewal <br />laws, which he and staff could respond to at a future meeting. <br />Council member Loo inquired how the legislation would affect bank financing. City <br />Attorney Light explained HB 1348 has new provisions for plans which include TIF to <br />negotiate an agreement with the other taxing districts on allocations of TIF revenue. For <br />plans that.include TIF, the agreement must stipulate how the tax increment will be <br />shared. The bill applies to new urban renewal plans after January 1, 2016. This <br />process is also triggered if there is a modification of an urban renewal plan, but the <br />intent is not to superimpose the provision on existing financing such as the Highway 42 <br />Urban Renewal Plan area. He voiced his belief there will be clarifying legislation of this <br />intent: <br />Deputy City Manager Balser agreed and explained staff is waiting for early legislation to <br />clarify existing urban renewal plans will not be affected by HB 1348. Staff will follow this <br />closely and speak with state legislators. <br />Mayor Muckle inquired about the membership of the urban renewal authority. City <br />Attomey Light explained HB 1348 stipulates an urban renewal authority shall consist of <br />13 members, however, it only applies if one of the triggering events occur. Without a <br />triggering event, the City would not have a mandatory obligation to expand to a 13 <br />member board. The current law states urban renewal boards shall consist of 11 <br />members. He stated one approach that may be taken in the next legislative session to <br />clarify the application of the statute is to increase the size of any urban renewal <br />authority to 13 members. If the bill as written did apply, the LRC would go from 7 to 13 <br />members and the Mayor has the right to appoint three of the new members, with the <br />consent of City Council. The balance would be made of 1 member from the County; 1 <br />member from the School District and 1 member appointed collectively by the other <br />taxing districts. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS, COMMITTEE REPORTS, AND IDENTIFICATION OF <br />FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS <br />Council member Stolzmann proposed various items for the Labor Day Parade. She <br />plans to use bunting and flags to decorate the golf carts and will wear red, white and <br />blue clothing. In order to look unified, she encouraged the City Council to do the same. <br />ADJOURN <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved foradjoumment, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. <br />All were in favor. The meeting adjoumed at 8:50 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.