Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />April 14, 2015 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />• Expanded Recreation and Senior Center <br />• Outdoor Aquatics Facility <br />• Pedestrian and Bike Connections <br />• Museum Building /Enhancements <br />• Expanded Street Resurfacing <br />Finance Director Watson said the City has kept the tax rate even (steady) during <br />the term of bonds. Revenue derived has increased. Started advanced payment <br />on debt in 2013. <br />Council member Loo asked why attendance at Rec Center dropped during 2003 <br />— 2007? Recreation Superintendent Kathy Martin said smaller studios opened, <br />other facilities opened. Parks and Recreation Director Stevens speculated that <br />people got tired of waiting for equipment. Council member Lipton noted that, <br />over years, there is fluctuation. We need to be conservative and not overextend <br />ourselves. There are upward and downward, cyclical trends. Council member <br />Stolzmann said it seems favorable to expand the Rec Center to a lot of people. <br />She favors seeing what we want and how much it costs then seeing what it takes <br />to fund it. She wants to make sure people know we aren't using "Library" money <br />to fund Rec Center expansion — that is a misconception some people have. <br />Council member Dalton said he does not think we should extend this bond. We <br />should end this bond then get voter approval for a new bond. Extending it <br />introduces confusion. <br />Council member Lipton is concerned about adding streets resurfacing to this list <br />of possible projects. He stated it is not a good idea. It would be a quick fix. He <br />believes the City has a fundamental issue in the budget related to street <br />resurfacing. This is a core service and should be funded by ongoing general <br />fund /capital revenues, not a new capital tax. <br />Council member Leh said that in the past, there was a division in the community <br />regarding the Library vs. Rec Center. <br />Council member Loo said she needs a definition of what an aquatics facility is. <br />Everyone has a different idea of what that means. Council member Keany said <br />in the past it was a full size pool, shallow area, not just a pool but mixed use <br />facilities. He would see a community task force (swim team, sports leagues, <br />dolphins, parents of small kids, seniors, etc.) to scope out what needs are. He <br />would support the expansion of the Museum campus and agrees with Council <br />member Dalton that it is not a good idea to mix too many pieces. <br />Council member Lipton said he is not sure we can do everything to fill every need <br />and every desire in the community. We need outdoor and indoor swimming <br />capacity. The City may not be able to satisfy both. <br />