My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2015 04 14
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2015 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2015 04 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:54:12 AM
Creation date
9/18/2015 8:54:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2015 04 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />April 14, 2015 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />purpose /multi age aquatic center. Would like to see if someone could run a for - <br />profit competitive pool. <br />Lots of times I can't get on machines. We need to think about age, <br />demographics. Seniors will move out, we will continually have new families. <br />Narrow use of competitive pool. I respect the passion. People from neighboring <br />communities would come to aquatics center. Have good food and beverage. <br />We forget about athletic kids. We drive to Littleton for soccer and we drive to <br />Boulder for swimming. <br />Important to break out on the survey competitive swim v. aquatics center to <br />provide clarity. <br />In terms of funding, what people want, under - represented groups — this has been <br />a good opportunity to understand fault lines. There is a lot of enthusiasm. <br />Discussion — City Properties <br />Economic Development Director DeJong led a discussion about several <br />properties the City owns: <br />• 96th street — 10 acres to realign 96th over the railroad tracks. Would need <br />survey, minor plat if you want to separate it. <br />• 712 and 734 CTC Boulevard <br />• Existing City Shops property at 1555 Empire Road <br />Council member Lipton said we need to take the long view. We should not take <br />short term view to reap short term reward. To sacrifice property may do a <br />disservice to future generations. Money the City would make is minor in the big <br />picture. Leasing may not be inappropriate. <br />Council member Dalton said when these properties were acquired Louisville was <br />a much smaller town. It is pretty built out — we have all the residents we are <br />going to have. This property is excess. <br />Council member Stolzmann said we should look at appropriate government uses <br />and private use that people would support. 96th street — open space or future <br />train station. But the other two can't find a use. <br />There was a discussion of property potential uses. <br />City Manager's Report <br />City Manager Fleming reviewed the Advanced Agenda. <br />Identification of Future Agenda Items <br />Museum Expansion <br />Continued look at bond options <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.