Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 21, 2015 <br />Page 5 of 17 <br />noted there was a minimum recommendation; then the City has to look at their revenue <br />structure and determine their comfort and risk profile in the reserves. <br />Mayor Muckle was comfortable with the 20% target as was Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. <br />Council member Lipton was okay with 20% for 2016 but wanted to see it increased in <br />years to come. Mayor Muckle agreed the reserves needed to at least stabilize if not <br />grow in 2019 and 2020. <br />Council member Stolzmann felt, as a target, 20% was appropriate but each year the <br />budget should be reviewed to try to increase that percentage. <br />Council member Lipton felt this was a very subjective way of determining the Open <br />Space & Parks Fund reserves. The top three properties for purchase are grouped, but a <br />property further down the list could become available. As the valuation of the top three <br />properties has not been discussed and the value undetermined, he was unsure what <br />the reserves should be. He questioned since there was no math behind it, whether <br />money from the General Fund should be transferred to the Open Space & Parks Fund <br />reserve as opposed to keeping the dollars in the general fund reserve where there is <br />flexibility to allocate where needed. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton agreed and stated if the top three properties are not available, <br />another property may rise to the top of the list. He agreed once funds are in the Open <br />Space & Parks Fund they are restricted, but if the funds are earmarked in the General <br />Fund, open space purchases can be made from the General Fund. <br />Council member Stolzmann took exception to the financial policy relative to the Open <br />Space & Parks Fund with respect to the General Fund "subsidizing" everything. She <br />noted the General Fund can pay for anything. The definition of the targeted fund <br />balance didn't mean anything. With the current operating expenditures discussion, there <br />is a large General Fund transfer into the Open Space & Parks Fund to pay for all the <br />services offered. With respect to parks maintenance she felt the transfers should be <br />described as to what they were paying for. She noted the introduction refers to the <br />Open Space & Parks Fund transfer paying for 50% of the Parks operations, but there is <br />not a matching financial policy. She recommended a policy be written and the <br />expenditures identified according to a set of principles. <br />City Manager Fleming noted there is some analysis on what the minimum fund balance <br />should be. It is approximately 350 acres of property valued at just over $35,000 per <br />acre to roughly coincide with other Boulder County properties and any participation from <br />other communities that might partner. That is how the $3.5 million dollar proposed <br />minimum balance comes from. The key issue is whether Council wants to keep the <br />dollars in the General Fund and only transfer when properties become available. <br />Mayor Muckle felt citizens want an acquisition reserve. Mayor Pro Tem Dalton did not <br />believe it mattered if there aren't any properties available. The money in the General <br />