Laserfiche WebLink
Cityot <br />Louisville <br />COLORADO • SINCE 1878 <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />AGENDA ITEM 8F <br />SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />CITY -WIDE MARGINAL COST FISCAL MODEL UPDATE <br />SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 <br />PRESENTED BY: SCOTT ROBINSON, AICP, PLANNING AND BUILDING SAFETY <br />DEPARTMENT <br />SUMMARY: <br />The City contracted TischlerBise, Inc. to create a new marginal cost fiscal impact model <br />to replace the City's current average cost model. The fiscal model is used to estimate <br />the fiscal impacts of proposed development. The fiscal model takes proposed <br />development by land use type (retail, office, residential, etc.) and other inputs and <br />computes projected tax and other revenues and projected operational and capital <br />expenditures. <br />The proposed fiscal model will be used by City staff in three areas: <br />1. Estimating City -wide fiscal impacts associated with various land use scenarios <br />developed as part of any Comprehensive Plan Update, or Small Area Planning <br />process; <br />2. Evaluating the municipal fiscal impacts anticipated with various proposed <br />individual land development applications; <br />3. Clarifying the City's levels of service during City Council goal setting, budgeting, <br />and long -range staffing analysis. <br />The consultant has agreed to create two models, one marginal cost model for City -wide <br />planning and budgeting, and one average cost hybrid model for evaluating individual <br />development proposals. The two models use the same assumptions of capacity and <br />levels of service. The City -wide model was presented at the June 29 Finance <br />Committee meeting, during which Committee members asked to verify the inventory of <br />City facilities. Staff is currently updating the counts of parks, recreation, and trails <br />facilities, and the model will be updated accordingly soon. <br />The Committee also asked staff to test out the model with the development scenarios <br />from the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan. Attached are inputs and outputs for the <br />one, two, and three -story alternatives, as well as a "likely buildout" estimate from staff. <br />The three -story alternative is equivalent to the full buildout under the current zoning. <br />Staff has noticed a couple errors with costs being allocated to areas with no <br />development and revenue being allocated to the Urban Renewal Authority for <br />development outside the URA and we are working with TischlerBise to correct them. <br />Staff requests any additional questions or comments from the Committee that need to <br />be addressed before the model is presented to the full Council for adoption. <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />