Laserfiche WebLink
112 cityof <br />r Louisville <br />COLORADO • SINCE 1878 <br />Memorandum I Department of Public Works <br />To: Water Committee <br />CC: Malcolm Fleming, City Manager <br />From: Kurt Kowar, P.E., Director of Public Works <br />Date: 3/7/13 <br />Re: Multifamily and Landscape Tap Fee Analysis <br />Background <br />The City of Louisville charges a Water Tap Fee under Municipal Code, Section 13.12.040.A.3, <br />that is intended for the growth related capital expansion costs for water resources, water <br />supply, water storage, transmission, treatment and distribution facilities, related costs and <br />factors. The Water Tap Fee is established by and different customer classes are compared to <br />the use of a single - family detached residential home or Single Family Equivalent (SFE). The <br />current SFE or %" sized meter water tap fee is $24,140. <br />The water tap fee was last updated in 2010 and is by code to be reviewed quarterly. A utility <br />rate study currently in the early initiation stages and scheduled for completion in the 4th <br />quarter of 2013 will thoroughly review the tap fee cost components and update existing tap <br />fees as necessary. <br />During the 2011 and 2012 calendar year, inquiries were received from various developers <br />working within the City regarding multifamily tap fees and the cost associated with this type of <br />development within the City. Multifamily tap fees are charged 100% percent ($24,140) for the <br />first unit and then a minimum of 60% ($14,484) for each apartment unit thereafter. <br />In November of 2011 (RMCS) and February of 2012 (Confluence) letters were submitted to City <br />Staff with cost comparisons for multifamily development between Louisville and various other <br />Front Range municipalities. These letters were reviewed by Staff and it was determined that <br />regardless of the cost differences, the letters were not all inclusive in their cost comparisons for <br />various water fee components or had selected municipalities with significantly different cost <br />structures and water resources than Louisville. Neither submission nor associate inquiry was <br />deemed to provide enough due diligence or specific analysis to support a change in the City's <br />tap fee methodology. <br />