My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2015 10 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2015 10 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:34:14 PM
Creation date
10/21/2015 1:19:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
FCPKT 2015 10 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />09/14/15 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />must be included in the Model as many residents use them, and in absence of <br />them, would be loading up Community Parks. <br />Members then discussed facility replacement costs. Director Russ stated that <br />the Arts Center, Museum, and Niehoff were not included in the Fiscal Impact <br />Model. Director Russ stated that they would be difficult to measure, to determine <br />the current service levels, and are impacted by regional area use. Russ <br />questioned whether or not new growth would or should necessarily trigger a new <br />facility. <br />Councilmember Keany stated that while a new museum would probably not be <br />triggered by growth, the need for additional "art center" type facilities could be as <br />existing space reaches capacity, or more simply availability. City Manager <br />Fleming agreed and stated that the Arts Center and Niehoff should be <br />incorporated into the Model. Director Russ stated that Niehoff would be added to <br />office space, and that staff would work to identify measures to be used for the <br />Arts Center. <br />The Finance Committee agreed to include shared space with a school district in <br />the Fiscal Impact Model as a neighborhood park. City Manager Fleming agreed <br />but stated the sharing of space has not always been as promised as in the case <br />of the Louisville Elementary gym, even though the City has paid for various <br />improvements. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated that she would like to see a summary table <br />that explains what capacity means for each facility and department. She <br />requested staff provide one scenario from the Fiscal Impact Model that members <br />could make changes to and see the various outcomes. Councilmember Keany <br />agreed stating that the previous information provided based on interviews <br />between TischlerBise and the City departments indicate none of the facilities or <br />departments are at capacity. Member Keany stated in his opinion, the public <br />would not agree. Mayor Muckle stated that he believes the Senior Center and <br />Recreation Center are well over capacity. <br />Resident Leary stated that the City needs to define "crowding" and determine <br />how to place a value on the "social cost" of such crowding. Mr. Leary stated that <br />some items generated from a Fiscal Impact Model relate to an economic impact, <br />but many others are level of service issues. Mr. Leary stated that the Models can <br />provide the information, but Council should set the levels of service. Member <br />Stolzmann stated that in her opinion, a level of service relates directly to an <br />experience, and vice versa. <br />Director Russ stated that not all departments or areas are impacted in the same <br />way when there is growth or new developments. Councilmember Keany stated <br />that, if we are at capacity now, then any new development would put us over <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.