Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND AQUATIC CENTER OPTIONS <br />DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2015 <br />PAGE4OF5 <br />Towns and Cities in Colorado <br />1. Aspen. In 2011, the Aspen City Council adopted an ordinance allowing for <br />residential vacation rentals in Lodging Zone Districts, Commercial Zone Districts, <br />Mixed Use Zone Districts, and Residential Zone Districts. The ordinance also limits <br />rentals to no more than 30 days. It requires that the host obtain a vacation rental <br />permit and a city tax ID and collect tax. If there is a homeowner's association, the <br />host must notify the HOA of the application for a vacation rental permit. The <br />ordinance prohibits a host from renting individual rooms and requires that the host <br />have a local representative to respond to renter issues. <br />2. Vail. Vail has not adopted any specific regulations for vacation rentals. Vail does not <br />require a business license for persons who rent no more than two units. Vail does <br />require that owners pay sales and lodging taxes. <br />3. Breckinridge. Hosts must obtain an Accommodations Unit license and pay an <br />annual fee. Hosts must also collect sales and lodging tax. <br />4. Frisco. Requires hosts to obtain a town business license and pay sales and lodging <br />taxes. <br />5. Colorado Springs. Short -term rentals are allowed in any zone where single family <br />or multi - family residential uses are allowed. Hosts must collect sales and lodging tax. <br />No signage identifying the property as a short -term rental is permitted. <br />FISCAL IMPACT: <br />Staff conducted an analysis of potential tax revenues from short -term rentals in <br />Louisville based on revenue assumptions generated by the City of Boulder. The <br />analysis showed, based on City of Boulder's visitation rates, that allowing and taxing <br />short -term rentals in Louisville could potentially generate between $20,000 and $60,000 <br />in new revenue. However, since visitation rates in Louisville would likely be much lower <br />than in the City of Boulder, staff believes it is very unlikely allowing and taxing short - <br />term rentals would reach even the lower level of that potential range. Furthermore, staff <br />believes the likely potential revenue would not fully cover additional costs associated <br />with the costs of issuing business licenses, collecting and auditing taxes imposed on <br />short -term rentals, and code enforcement related to short -term rentals if the City adopts <br />and strictly enforces regulations governing short -term rentals. Finally, if the Council <br />wants to change the City's zoning to allow the short -term rentals in residential zone <br />districts, the effect would be to expand the City's tax base on which sales tax and <br />lodging tax is applied. This would require a TABOR election, like Boulder conducted on <br />November 2, 2015. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff is seeking a discussion with City Council and the Community regarding the City's <br />short -term rental policies and regulations with the following conversation topics: <br />• Should potential short -term rental regulations be updated for clarification? <br />• Should potential short -term rental regulations be modified to expand, or restrict <br />the activity in Louisville in terms of: <br />• Location? <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />11 <br />