My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 11 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 11 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2022 10:48:27 AM
Creation date
11/9/2015 8:45:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A6
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 11 02
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 13, 2015 <br />Page 16 of 18 <br />Mayor Muckle noted the curve has looked like this for several years due to the <br />conservative estimates on revenue in future years and expenses not being precise. <br />City Manager Fleming agreed it was based on a conservative view. It is important to <br />see and keep in mind when looking at building related revenues, to not become <br />dependent on one -time revenues. Finance Director Watson explained this graph was <br />created when Council member Keany expressed concern the City was funding ongoing <br />expenses with one -time revenues. Creating a definition of operational costs; recurring <br />revenue and recurring expenses help to show how the fund balance reserves are being <br />built with one -time revenues. <br />Council member Lipton was concerned the budget looked out of balance with this <br />graph. It appears the 2016 budget is balanced with one -time revenues. He wanted to <br />plan to talk about this in the longer term. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed this needed to be a topic of discussion since policy states the City <br />does not fund operational expenses with one -time revenues. <br />Council member Stolzmann didn't feel the Parks operating expenditures were correctly <br />captured and after the discussion in December, this problem may be made worse. <br />Finance Director Watson noted within the financial policies a balanced budget is defined <br />and the intent is to have a structurally balanced budget. The time to have the <br />conversation may be during the financial policy discussion. <br />Council member Loo asked about the proposed funding in 2017 of the Visitor Center <br />and Historical Museum. With the escalating cost of doing business, she would like to <br />start to have a serious conversation about the dollars spent on design. There is no <br />reason to design if it is not going to be built. She suggested the citizens interested in <br />this might look at raising funds. With the sun - setting of the Historic Preservation Fund, <br />the Historical Commission and Historic Preservation Commission could do a letter of <br />understanding to put the Museum in dedicated funding. She asked if the increased <br />visits to the Museum were school children. <br />Library and Museum Director Barrett noted there were more school tours, but not a <br />significant part of the increased numbers. Having the Museum open during the Friday <br />nights of Art Walk and the added hours for the Museum both increased visits. <br />Council member Loo suggested looking at other ways to finance the visitor center and <br />museum in 2017. <br />Council member Lipton remembered talking with Historical Commission concerning <br />funding a modest design or concept plan to assist in raising funds. <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.