My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 12 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 12 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:10 AM
Creation date
12/11/2015 8:30:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2015 12 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 12, 2015 <br />Page 8 of 41 <br />Eric Hartronft, Hartronft Associates, p.c., 950 Spruce Street, Suite 1A, Louisville, CO <br />Staff has gone through a comprehensive review of our proposal so I will hit a few items we think <br />are important regarding your decision tonight. This existing site is a well -known corner with the <br />sign, Drive Like Your Kids Live Here. We transition from commercial to residential at this point in <br />town. There is a lot of activity to the east that will be happening with the underpass and the <br />DELO development. This corner represents a gateway, not only from north Main Street, but also <br />from the east redevelopment area. I think it is a really important corner. It is important that we <br />have a strong commercial presence there. We have to be able to connect this north part to <br />Downtown. It is pretty tough to drag retail pedestrian traffic that far north. You have got to have <br />some kind of a critical mass there to be able to do that. I think that Ronda's project intends to do <br />that. We always start our projects with design drivers. A few imports things are: <br />Significant gateway to downtown <br />Address the corner from north Main Street and east <br />Provide rich pedestrian experience <br />Opportunities for outdoor dining and hang out space <br />Accommodate owner's business and residence <br />Provide opportunities for new Main Street busine <br />Maintain the existing house if possible <br />Relate to surrounding residential and comma .reas <br />Respect Old Town and Downtown Design G .es <br />Better utilization South Street and museum par <br />Existing house is better than parking lot <br />Eliminate curb cut and add street •a_'ng <br />Intimate courtyard seating amenit'' ` destrian ex • qce <br />Meaningful usable open space <br />Retain residential building <br />Describing the building, the main floor has ith offices on the second floor. <br />Being able to create some open space betty- existing r- idence and the new building <br />became an important design driver. It created an intimate little courtyard space which can be a <br />lot of things depending on the type of commercial tenant we get on the main floor. To the south <br />is the 931 Main Street building which will be constructing a new building behind the existing <br />building. The new building is about 30' tall with a zero lot line. We have tried to maintain a <br />working clearance walkway through the two buildings, so we are set back from the property line. <br />As far as the parking is concerned, we did look at a lot of different alternatives. To provide more <br />parking, we would have had to take the house down. There was no way to work around it given <br />the position it is in on the site and where you want to have storefronts and commercial energy <br />on the Main Street side. If we put a parking lot back there, we clearly would have had to remove <br />the existing house. We talked to Planning about this and thought our idea was a good one, <br />which was to keep the house. Right now, the parking in the Museum site and along South Street <br />is fairly under - utilized. We think it is important to utilize every Downtown parking space. Being <br />able to pay a fee in- lieu -of for the project is highly appropriate given where it is in town. There <br />may be other areas that have more pressure for parking, but this is not one of them. There is a <br />garage currently behind -the house that accesses from South Street. By turning parking off the <br />alley, we eliminate the curb cut on South Street which gives us another parking space on the <br />street. Staff has talked about expanding the diagonal parking into this block on South. We think <br />it is a good idea and would pick up a couple more parking spaces with that plan. We encourage <br />the City to continue looking at those efforts. Anytime we can use the asphalt we have, it will be a <br />better day. Moving up in the building, we are proposing a third floor which would be the owner's <br />loft apartment and some additional open space with a roof deck for the loft. Looking at how the <br />site responds to our design drivers, it has a strong corner element visibility both from the east <br />and the north as you approach Downtown and has architecture that holds the corner as an <br />important element. We feel that the pedestrian experience along the store front with shop <br />windows (whether it's a restaurant or retail shop) and providing sidewalk seating will help to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.