My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 12 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 12 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:01 PM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:09:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 12 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 1, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 20 <br />pub is located across from the climbing gym and follows the design principles of the <br />gym, but on a smaller scale. The brew pub has outdoor seating enclosed by metal <br />fencings. It will have a partially covered and uncovered area. The brew pub design is <br />based on a free standing element. The graphic on the outside of the building (signage) <br />is a portion of the logo. There are matching logos on the climbing gym and brew pub. <br />The applicant wished to pursue the signage. The building is south facing and is being <br />designed to be energy efficient and solar panels are proposed in the future. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Loo asked if the graphic would be allowed if there wasn't any wording. <br />Planner I Trice explained it would still be characterized as a sign because it is the logo. <br />Council member Loo asked the applicant about the CTC Owners Association's <br />objection to the logo. Mr. Johnson stated they do not know why the CTC Owners <br />Association objected to the logo. Planner I Trice explained the signage was not a part <br />of the original submittal when it was referred to the CTC Owners Association. Staff <br />forwarded the signage request to the CTC Owners Association and they concurred with <br />staff's recommendation. <br />Council member Keany explained he called staff about the classification of a school for <br />recreation facilities and was told there is no such classification. He asked staff to bring <br />back a classification change. He felt there should be some sort of classification use <br />within the community. He had concerns it conflicted with other portions of the Code <br />limiting businesses within a certain distance from a school. Planner I Trice explained <br />the LMC specifies schools in the definition of medical and recreational marijuana as <br />public and private, pre - school, elementary, middle, junior high or high school so would <br />not apply here. She noted the surrounding area is industrial, which would not allow <br />marijuana. <br />Interim Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained the definition is also used <br />by the Local Licensing Authority for alcohol related licenses. He noted staff agrees and <br />the Planning Commission prioritized creating a use definition for fitness facility in the <br />use table of the Louisville Municipal Code. Staff is in the process of creating a <br />definition. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated this is an excellent application and she was excited <br />to see this project come to Louisville. She addressed Use Group 9 — Public and private <br />schools, studios for profession work, teaching for fine arts, photography, drama, dance, <br />but not including a commercial gymnasium. She asked staff to elaborate how this <br />proposal fits into Use Group 9. <br />Planner 1 Trice explained the proposal falls into Group 9 because they will be teaching <br />classes. She asked the applicant to explain what will be taught at the climbing gym. Mr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.