Laserfiche WebLink
the remainder, which says" .... and <br /> with any amendments thereto .... ,, <br /> <br />Brisnehan: That would be satisfactory. Yes. <br /> <br />Davidson called for any other comments on the annexation agreement. <br />NONE <br /> <br />Howard moved that Council adopt the annexation agreement, including <br />the changes. Seconded by Mayer. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />For clarification, if you added a <br />new paragraph 25 that says nothing <br />in this agreement shall limit the <br />city's authority to apply its <br />ordinances and regulations, as <br />amended from time to time, to the <br />owner of the property. Would that <br />be satisfactory? What would you <br />like to do with the small storage <br />facilities? <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />I think that that gives the Council <br />the chance to deny it, unless the <br />Council feels that we need to make <br />that part of the agreement. <br /> <br />Howard agreed that his motion included the language that the City <br />Attorney proposed. Seconder, Mayer, accepted that. Roll call was <br />taken. Motion passed by a 6 - 0 vote with Hornbostel being absent. <br /> <br />RETURNED TO: ORDINANCE NO. 1110, SERIES 1993 - ANNEXING TO <br />THE CITY OF LOUISVITWm, COLORADO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY - <br />STELMACH ANNEXATION - 2ND READING - PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />Griffiths had previously read the title. <br /> <br />Davidson opened the public hearing, asking for the applicant's <br />presentation. <br /> <br />Brisnehan stated that he would be happy to answer any questions. <br /> <br />Davidson called for anyone in the audience wishing to speak in <br />favor or against Ordinance No. 1110. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />Davidson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />