My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2016 01 12
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2016 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2016 01 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:55:07 AM
Creation date
1/14/2016 9:32:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2016 01 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
An elected official should base his /her decision on matters presented during <br />the hearing. <br />An elected official sitting in a quasi-judicial capacity should not discuss a <br />pending quasi - judicial matter with any of the parties involved in the matter, <br />outside the hearing. <br />An elected official sitting in a quasi - judicial capacity should not discuss a <br />pending quasi - judicial matter with a member of the public outside the hearing. <br />An elected official sitting in a quasi-judicial capacity should not discuss a <br />pending quasi - judicial matter with staff or other members of the quasi - judicial <br />body outside the hearing. <br />To the extent an elected official sitting in a quasi - judicial capacity has <br />discussions with parties or citizens prior to a quasi - judicial hearing, the official <br />should fully disclose such discussions at the outset of the hearing. The official <br />should give any of the parties to the application or opposing the application <br />an opportunity to request that the official not participate in the hearing if they <br />feel his or her ex parte discussions prejudiced their ability to be fair and <br />impartial. The official is not required to refrain from participation based on <br />such a request. <br />To the extent an elected official sitting in a quasi - judicial capacity receives <br />written materials or documents relating to the application, the official should <br />fully disclose such documents and, unless they are likely to prejudice the rest <br />of the tribunal, should provide them with copies. <br />In cases, where the official's ex parte discussions or review of documents <br />outside the hearing renders them unable to be fair and impartial, they should <br />refrain from participating. Louisville's Code of Ethics suggests that such <br />nonparticipation may be appropriate where there would be an appearance of <br />unfairness or partiality if the official participated in the hearing. <br />D. Constituent contacts in e-mail, electronic media times <br />The explosion in recent years in e -mail communications and social media <br />contacts have made it even more problematic to avoid ex parte <br />communications. Many elected officials make their official e -mail address <br />available to the public. Upon receiving an e-mail, it may be difficult to <br />determine whether it relates to a legislative matter or a quasi - judicial matter <br />pending before the Council or Commission until you open it. Such <br />communications require added vigilance in considering whether to open the <br />communication, whether and how to respond to it, and disclosures that may <br />need to be made to the remainder of Council regarding information received. <br />Page 13 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.